The FBI broke its own rules when using Section 207 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to investigate BLM protesters, Jan 6 rioters and Congressional Campaign donations.
The Biden administration is attempting to compel TikTok to divest itself from its Beijing-based ByteDance, which is largely owned by American behemoths.
Utah's Republican Gov. Spencer Cox signed two laws restricting minors' social media usage, becoming the first state to pass legislation limiting a child's access.
We re not actively engaged in the logistics of setting that up right now. something else that could be on the agenda for that call if and when it happens. chinese owned social media app. tiktok. biden s suspects bytedance of spying on americans and stealing their data. something a company seemed to acknowledge today. quote, we have strongly condemned the actions of the individuals found to have been involved and they are no longer employed at bytedance. the doj has now subpoenaed bytedance for information about efforts by its employees to access u.s. journalist s location information and other private user data through the tiktok app. the biden administration is now pushing for a total u.s. ban on tiktok, something the company s chinese overlords are fiercely resisting. tiktok is scrambling to find an american buyer they hope this could allow their platform to stay operational. keep some of their u.s. users. no word yet on who that buyer might ultimately be.
well, claire, you know, certainly, there s different sack factions there. the fox news sound bites say, we re giving the farm away to ukraine. we re doing things like spying on americans. then there are some you know, responsible individuals there. i wrote the article because i m trying to appeal to kind of some sanity here. at the end of the day, that s how things are going to get done. for things to pass in the house, there has to be some bipartisan compromise. you know, i do worry for the struggle of joe s old party. you know, it is incumbent on them to take measures that are going to help protect americans, help keep us safe, not go down the rabbit hole of, you know, late night, the late-night crazy on other networks. let s see what happens. certainly, it is worth making an appeal. yeah. you know, when it was my old party, i grew up in a family of, you know, my democr parents had
Talking about are asking a very secret special court, only created in 1978 to authorize the most broad intrusion on the lives of americans and others that is possible under the laws sean: spying on americans. that s right. i want to say one more point about the so-called questionss that are out there. if this is for informational purposes, no reason they could not be put to the president for writing and not responded to through a lawyer proper. sean: donald trump talk to the team that mueller has put together, i would never allow it. absolutely not, and no lawyer ever would.ur sean: it is a perjury trap. i will give you one example that it is a perjury trap, mueller wants him to recount the conversation with comey, if the president were to deviate one word from comey s account, mueller would charge him with perjury. sean: last word, sara. absolutely, he should not speak a word if he does not have to. there is no way that the
Secret special court, only created in 1978 to authorize the most broad intrusion on the lives of americans and others that is possible under the laws sean: spying on americans. that is hard to come i want to say one more point about the so-called questions that are out there. if this is for inter-very could not be put to the president for writing and not responded to through a lawyer proper. sean: we donald trump talk to the team that mueller has put together, i would never allow it? absolutely not, and no lawyer ever would. sean: it is a perjury trap. i will give you one example that it is a perjury trap, mueller oe conversation with comey, if the president were to deviate one word from comey s account, mueller would charge him with perjury. sean: last word, sara
Debate about all of these measures, and so there was a security apparatus that was put in place that got beyond the debate of the american public and congress failed to really keep that debate going. well, i was there, and we did have a debate once it was disclosed by the bush administration in its first term that the authority used for the program was the president s commander in chief authority and it didn t go through congress and it didn t comply with the foreign intelligence surveillance act. congress remanded fisa in 2008 and we had a debate. i wish more people had listened in seven years later we had a debate. well, yeah, but four of them were in secret. we had a debate. we tried to amend it earlier, it took a while, congress doesn t move very fast, especially since newt left but can i just finish my thought. we should have had a better debate. labeling this guy a traitor before he s convicted i don t think is fair, but i think what he did was, one, he wasn t a whistle-b
Information about so-called spying on americans, he leaked our technology playbook, and that really compromises us. what about what he says which is you can t prove there was any real damage done? look how does he know that is an obvious follow-up? i think both sides have some credibility problems. the administration has been evasive and has lied about its espionage tactics but on the other hand i would have more faith in snowden if he wasn t a guest of vladimir putin. younger people have a more favorable illinompression becau they re less worried about ou their data is used. there s an interesting juxtaposition. they re used to it. on the one hand we re used to the world being that way. the way young folks relate to snowden goes to this idea mill len yells, i ll take it into my own hands, i can do it. there s a part of snowden that represents more of a culture. newt, here is secretary hagel