for black people what the real stakes are, and what the impact will have on their lives. that s the tradition that capital b is following. i love that. really, for those of us who navigate newsrooms, there s such credo to these niche outlets, when we think about the rules in journalism, they offer censure white men. rules made up by folks that don t look like us and that s everything from standards and practices at network outlets to editorial decision makers that not only print and broadcast as well. the space has to be disrupted and you re right, people have abandoned the mainstream press because of reasons like that. how do you plan on getting people to consume your content,
adjunct journalism professor at also her mara schiavocampo and david zurawik is back with us as well. joe, you ve run networks. unpack it for us. after reading these statements this week, hearing about violations of newsstand cards and then reading these two different newspaper accounts, what do you think is going on here? the first thing is there s nothing more important than to the brand than the credibility of the organization when you are in news and you must do everything you can to maintain that credibility. in fact, all the news organizations have standards and practices, all the major news organizations, we at cbs, we at fox even had them where you cannot even do anything that appears to be a conflict of interest. you are also to fully disclose anything that could be considered a conflict of interest to management. let me back up by saying that jeff zucker was one of the best executive producers i have ever seen in the business. he was a hell of a competitor
this legal probe and on tuesday the warner media ceo gave specifics about it saying based on interviews with more than 40 individuals and a review of over 100,000 texts and emails the interview found violations of government policies including the news, standards and practices by jeff zucker, allison gollust and chris cuomo. that s a serious charge but it s vague. what happened? warner media is not saying but on friday the new york times and wall street journal offered new and in some ways differing details. the journal said warner media determined a statement that gollust gave about her relationship with zucker was misleading, suggesting that it started before covid years ago. they basically said she misled cnn viewers. but gollust s spokesperson doubled down on the timeline she presented and hinted she might sue warner. the times story came out a few minutes later and offered a different explanation, suggesting the standards violation had to do with gollust s communication with
including about the details of mr. cuomo s support for his brother. in a scene and snapping back telling the journal about cuomo has made a number of accusations that are patently false pride this reinforces what he was terminated for filing our standards and practices. so it s about to get uglier than a sheep with a bikini wax. but whoever wins this battle, he can t look good for cnn. it s no longer the most trusted name in news at regional airports or delta terminals. even the broadcasting balloon boy wonders, has cnn lost trust as a result of this? has cnn lost trust as a result of this? well, i don t know. that is hard to say. cnn has lost trust. home xp when he just had a! that maybe it is hard to say. how can they lose something been destroyed with their own hand? where is this trust to lose after the occlusion hoax, the fine people lie, the injecting bleach hoax, covington, kavanaugh, smollett.