and threatens what it calls unpredictable consequences if those shipments of military assistance continue. now, the timing of this is potentially very significant because this note was sent on tuesday evening of this last week, just as word was beginning to leak out of another package of us military aid to ukraine $800 million worth which, for the first time, included some heavy and sophisticated weapons, including howitzers, long range artillery, and those sort of things, designed to match russian capabilities on the ground in eastern ukraine, around the disputed donbas region. now, it doesn t appear that this is going to provoke any sort of change in strategy on the part of the us indeed, it doesn t seem to have concerned people at the white house very much. there was a tweet from a state department spokeswoman, who said, nothing will dissuade us from the strategy
you re getting more belligerent trying to either invade taiwan or effectively take control and it s invade taiwan or effectively take control and it s important industries would you let them get away with that quick. it s an end in play on - inappropriate place to talk about other china knows what i will do. china knows. steve: president xi knew that trump would not stand for any aggression and putin knew that will do. trump would not stand for any aggression. iran and north korea all new and america was safer as a result. sadly that is not the sadly that is not the situation we face today. situation we face today. today we have a president who is undermining all of america s advantages because he is too weak and too feeble to stand up to the far left activists who now run his party. as a result, instead of peace through strength, we could be facing war through weakness. tell us what you think and please share this message when we post it. has been a former state has been a former s
you re getting more belligerent trying to either invade taiwan or effectively take control and it s invade taiwan or effectively take control and it s important industries would you let them get away with that quick. it s an end in play on - inappropriate place to talk about other china knows what i will do. china knows. steve: president xi knew that trump would not stand for any aggression and putin knew that will do. trump would not stand for any aggression. iran and north korea all new and america was safer as a result. sadly that is not the sadly that is not the situation we face today. situation we face today. today we have a president who is undermining all of america s advantages because he is too weak and too feeble to stand up to the far left activists who now run his party. as a result, instead of peace through strength, we could be facing war through weakness. tell us what you think and please share this message when we post it. has been a former state has been a former s
you re getting more belligerent trying to either invade taiwan or effectively take control and it s invade taiwan or effectively take control and it s important industries would you let them get away with that quick. it s an end in play on - inappropriate place to talk about other china knows what i will do. china knows. steve: president xi knew that trump would not stand for any aggression and putin knew that will do. trump would not stand for any aggression. iran and north korea all new and america was safer as a result. sadly that is not the sadly that is not the situation we face today. situation we face today. today we have a president who is undermining all of america s advantages because he is too weak and too feeble to stand up to the far left activists who now run his party. as a result, instead of peace through strength, we could be facing war through weakness. tell us what you think and please share this message when we post it. has been a former state has been a former s
APN's mission is to educate and persuade the American public and its leadership to support and adopt policies that will lead to comprehensive, durable, Israeli-Palestinian and Israeli-Arab peace, based on a two-state solution, guaranteeing both peoples security, and consistent with U.S. national interests.