At Christmas we are traditionally asked to remember those less fortunate than ourselves. So it perhaps bears recalling that, in the uncomfortable parable of the sheep and the goats, Jesus explicitly equates one particular duty with feeding the poor, welcoming strangers, and helping the sick: the duty of visiting those in prison.
meadows was acting within his federal capacity within federal responsibility and i think that is a core argument here. not whether he was acing in his official capacity, but whether he was trying to do was a state function as posed to a federal function. we re watching this intently for a number of reasons. not the least of which is that mark meadows is not the only one who wants his case moved to federal court, not the only cove defendant and we re seeing if other co-defendants follow along those lines. a lot will depend on what we see. if the judge does rule in favor of mark meadows, what does that do to the other co-defendants. every one of them has to go through a fact presentation and that is what judge has to look at. mark meadows probably has the best shot at it. just in terms of his role at the white house, because the way they re trying to say the way they re framing things is that everything that he did wasn t criminal per se. setting up a call. setting up a meeting. g
federal policies, they were carrying out trump s campaign policies. they were not dealing with a president s official duties, which might have to do with the integrity of elections. the president has no official duties with respect to the electoral college. that s completely a state function. so the question is how strict the judge will be about applying the federal removal statute and then meadows and the others are also trying to say we were federal officials, federal policy state policies that they should have immunity from state prosecution and the cases have gone in both directions. this is what they had to do and we ll see what the judge does. a federal judge has ordered the d.a. to respond to clarke s emergency request by tomorrow afternoon. the federal judge did is to
tactically. judge nancy gernter, back in the case of georgia, what do you make of the move by jeffrey clark or mark meadows to move this to federal court? it s a move they had to make and it is a move that they they are entitled to try to make. the question is, this is a removal where federal officials, arguably carrying out federal policies, saying, they can t get a fair trial in state court, and they had federal defenses, immunity from these prosecutions. the issue here is going to be weather because this all took place while meadows was chief of staff, that that somehow inoculates it from state charges, or whether or not the judge is going to say, wait a minute wait a minute, what they were doing was not carrying out federal policies. they were carrying out trump s campaign policies. they were not dealing with the presidents official duties, which might have to do with the integrity of elections. the president has no official duties with respect to the electoral college. t
Haryana Board BSEH Class 11 Chemistry Syllabus 2024: Get here the detailed Chemistry Syllabus of Haryana Board for Class 11 with Suggested Question Paper Design and start your preparation to score better in the board exam. HBSE 11th Chemistry