in texas should be able to say that something the fda determined doesn t stand. well of course, you ve got two rulings, two separate federal judges really different ways on it. this will ultimately probably go to the u. s supreme court, and it s not unusual for a judge to review the administrative rulemaking process to see if adequate notice if the evidence supports it or not, so it s not unusual is to conclusion that is different from what another federal judge has ruled. but basically though i ll just note that other ruling came down just to for everyone else who who wasn t tracking it closely came down after this ruling from a texas judge. we hear a lot from republicans that are pro life for a certain abortion positions on abortion that they believe it s a states rights issue. it s something for states to decide. so if that is the position of republicans, then why should a federal judge be able to decide what they what kind of medication the fda approves? well there s two issues the
probably go to the u. s. supreme court, and it s not unusual for a judge to review the administrative rulemaking process to see if adequate notice if the evidence supports it or not, so it s not unusual is to conclusion that is different from what another federal judge has ruled. but basically though i ll just note that other ruling came down just to for everyone else who who wasn t tracking it closely came down after this ruling from a texas judge. we hear a lot from republicans that are pro life for a certain abortion positions on abortion that they believe it s a states rights issue. it s something for states to decide. so if that is the position of republicans, then why should a federal judge be able to decide what they what kind of medication the fda approves? well there s two issues there. one is simply that roe versus wade whenever it was reversed by the supreme court did return it to the states and the states right now are making their own public health determinations
long been part of the conservative movement. there s been a part of the conservative movement that s been deeply socially conservative. and from the beginning, when roe v. wade was first made into law, they wanted to overturn it because they believe that all unborn life should be protected at the federal level. that s the position that lindsey graham is voting now. not what he supported before. nine, there are other conservatives, like allison s position, that she just very articulately mentioned, which is that, you know what, we believe in life, but we believe this should be a states rights issue, and we believe that this was decided, roe v. wade was decided, based on terrible reasoning and an event it right to privacy in the constitution. this is bad jurisprudence. for that reason, we will overturn it, and light federalism pvr gates. oh, you re just seeing these schism in the conservative movement play itself out in one. man but then there is the political part of it, where it coul
gop leaders and hope that there would be one issue this week that their party could rail against. the u.s. has a serious inflation problem. and inflation continues to choke the american people? this is a serious problem. federal ban on abortions after 15 weeks. he s done promise this. capital including mitch mcconnell, distance themselves, telling cnn, most of the members of my conference prefer that this would be dealt with at the state level. the granville undercuts the gop focus to make abortion a states rights issue. putting a danger republicans and a difficult spot less than two months before the midterms. are you supporting this lindsey graham 15-week abortion ban? i m reviewing, it i m pro-life. is this helpful for you as your request to take back the majority?
the time in the building. powerful people like justices can say we can work safely, but frontline workers, everyone else has to go out and essentially risk their lives, and there are outbreaks going on everywhere. osha s job is to make workplaces are safe. you can have just a few people in the room, but if there s no ventilation, they re going to get expose and could get really sick. it struck me that these justices having no idea what real life is like, for what work is like for most people in the country. the supreme court was hearing those arguments and the incoming governor of virginia is going to join the challenge against them, and that is what he vowed to do during the campaign, hallie. the reason why it s significant coming today is because if the supreme court does make this a states rights issue, you can see what s going to happen here. where you live will depend how you experience the virus not just when it comes to mask but vaccine uptake and that s