Costs such expensive and not getting results. Good morning. It is simply a ponzi scheme that will not last. 6 million policies have been canceled. That is approximately 20 million people. I have heard about 500,000 have actually paid for a plan. That is a scheme that cannot last. Going to behere is a massive Insurance Company bailout for this scheme. The cure is worse than the problem. S, amount of spin, lie deception is going to change that fact. It is just a matter of time before the whole thing crumbles. It will require a massive bailout. Forget the spin. Guest that is the precise view of an opponent of the Affordable Care act. I am a reporter. There are Success Stories for some people under the Affordable Care act. Others are not benefiting as much. The law is highly controversial among many members thank youlic. Host very much for joining us this morning. Medicare and medicaid Officials Say last year saw the Lowest Health Insurance Premium increases since 1986. The Journal Health
Stocking this skinny black teenager who doesnt have a this skinnylking black teenager who doesnt have a weapon. The big guy has begun. They get into it has a gun. They get into a fight and he gets off on selfdefense. I think that made a lot of folks have doubts about our criminal Justice System and whether it really respectful lives of all of our citizens. Respects the lives of all of our citizens. One of your callers engine earlier the dred scott case, that the black man has no rights that the white man is bound to respect. The Trayvon Martin really, the George Zimmerman case made some people feel like that, like African American lives dont mean as much as other people. Host we have been talking to paul butler, a law professor at georgetown, a graduate of yale and harvard. Next the pentagon release a the Labor Department releases the december jobs report. From the Cato Institute legal ability list debate the constitutionality of president obamas recess appointments. Its disappointing
The gentleman for his response, mr. Speaker. The question was yes we want to get people back to work. Everybody wants to get people back to work. There is no doubt about that. Hopefully, we would be at full employment. One defines that whether three percent or four percent unemployment which would be transition employment or unemployment. We want everybody back to work. The issue is if we dont get everybody back to work, 192,000 new jobs this past month that is good but not good enough. Is why we have continuing 6. 7 unemployment. My question to the majority assume forif argument that the letter to which he refers is accurate. I dont accept that premise but accepting that premise but the minute with the majority leader be amenable to rather than do what the senate does making a retrospective so that the 3. 5 months that wouldve gone from january 1 or december 29, i suppose, of last year to today and paying that back. Simply extending for five months while people continue to look for em
We need to ensure the economy has more momentum and wereentu having a recovery that leaves no one behind. In terms of job growth, there is no question there is opportunith to move the ball forward as a country. The president has put forward a grand bargain ono on jobs that o combine and have a minute minimn solution. We are working onrm housing refm on immigration, on manufacturing. There is also no question that we have to make sure this recovery does leave no one behind and that means addressing what is clearly, perhaps the worst legacy of the great recession, which is the longterm unemployment that we still face in our country. Hort who are d, those hort longterm unemployed continue to ace a very difficult liberal mark market. Who stay w that those out of the liberal force too serious n suffer economic and psychological a country have to be committed to doing help those e can to who are longterm unemployed find new jobs to support their families, get them back on their feet. That is
Individual of 123,000 all the way up to about 3. 5 million if you look at the amounts an individual can contribute to and party,didates committees, combined. A major influx of big money into the political process. Our organization has estimated about 1 billion to political spending in the next election. And is that a good thing, a bad thing, a neutral thing . Think its i think its disaster for our democracy. Why . We already had a system in which the wealthiest few are able to exert so much more elected systemr and our elected representatives than the rest of us and a like this just makes a bad situation worse. Donald mcgahn, do you agree opinion . No, i dont. Why . Upon a fewed assumption that i dont think are necessarily true. First, the idea that theres going to automatically be 1 billion of new money in elections is frankly, with all respect, ridiculous. People in this country can spend on their owney independent of candidates already. This has been the case for years going back to