Page 229 - Statutes News Today

The only colors we are worried about and observing the statutes as laid down. i think 50 cent, im not going to start calling 50-cent a buck 50 because of what he said about bail reform. zero bailing no way. hes worried its going to get worse. of course its going to get worse. no penalty for the crime and all the criminals know it. >> emily: penalties are also about rehabilitation and deterrence. depending on the color of your skin, you get off or you get a lighter sentence because of rectifying ...

Of those solutions. >>solution paul mauro is a attod retired nypd inspector and he joins us now. paul, you know, i cant help but think about this story. itsk abou incredibly sad that n who devoted so much the united states of america loses his life to crime in the capitol oft the united states of america. >> what does that say about us? i mean, its just terrible. you know, the sort of symbolism of this is honest, capable, right? thy who helpsn es americans in a really tough part of the world. is...

The united states shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity. receiving a federal, financial assistance. you see, people of color, especially black americans, they face a legacy dynamic as well. one that didnt involve an application or an essay or an alumni parent. i am talking about the centuries-long legacy of systemic racial oppression that has plagued th...

Would have blocked it. so thats a really weird talking point they keep hanging on to to make it sound like trumps people are even agreeing with them. thats not true. this case has been dragged for five years, much of it so that statutes of limitations would be run out as well. this is complete interference by the deep state, by the fbi, by the doj, covering up at the highest levels weaponizing government to protect this family and their criminal enterprise, which is now becoming more and more ap...

Higher education act. justice roberts says in his decision nothing in this decision applies to higher education act. it only applies to heros act. the president is perfectly within his right to go under the higher education act. >> isnt it congress that really has the authority here to do this? shouldnt it be congress that is taking action? >> it was congress that took action. congress passed the heros act. congress passed the higher education act. in those acts, we explicitly gave the secretary...

Congress passed the higher education act. in those acts, we explicitly gave the secretary the authority under the higher education act to waive or cancel student loans. that was a congressional act. if congress has a problem with the higher education act, they can try to repeal it. if congress had a problem with the broad power we gave under the heros act, they could try to repeal it. but what this court has done is assert the role of the legislature. theyve engaged in judicial activism. theyre ...

Its going to allow for modification alterations but not a sweeping cancellation. >> yes. you didnt touch on this the call that major powers, questioned doc which shows essentially look, congress has to be very specific about his intentions when it passes something. they do not want things to be misinterpreted essentially. i guess that is what youre saying here. they could read into the same problem with the president decide to go down this route with a higher education act of 19625. >> that is e...

That the white universities like harvard and the university of north carolina and a lot of universities, the way they are using race goes too far. it has negative consequences for many applicants in particular asian applicants. in the court said that is just not compatible with prior precedent on either the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment for title vi of the civil rights act. and that it is one thing to look at applicants as individuals and look at their experiences and their backg...

Didnt have any standing because the state wasnt in a position to litigate for this separate public corporation. thats what justice kagan is essentially saying. like youre giving this entity a pass on something very fundamental to litigation. does the person whos bringing the case even have an injury at all? shes saying, no, they didnt, and instead, the court skips over that to try and decide in its broadest possible terms that the heroes act doesnt say what the president and congress at the time...

Antidiscrimination laws, and on the repayment of student loans, and in that case, the high court dealt the biden white house a significant setback. writing for the majority, chief justice john roberts said the biden administration overstepped its legal authority to justify its sweeping student loan cancellation plan. a 2003 law allows the administration to "waive or modify statutes pertaining to student loans during national emergencies." roberts wrote, "it does not permit basic and fundamental ...