all have this strength inside of us , but until you test it, you just don t know what s there. all right. we ve heard a lot of people murmuring and wondering, okay, football, given this nearokay catastrophic injury forr damar hamlin, is it too dangerous, too violent? ma should we discourage young people, especially from playing it? well, whatfo aboutotba the net positives of football? great news today about the remarkable progress that damar hamlin hast made. wht other questions are arising about football itself. stionsesthat debate continues. jo joining us now is dr. neil al-atrash, physician for the l.a. rams and the dodgers. not too shabby, doctor . great to see you tonight. you you have daily interaction c
midterm elections does w contribute to what we have now. and i do understand that this is a little disconcertinthgs fa to have this kind of fight. but really, what s far morealth embarrassing than a healthy ruls debate about who should be speaker and what the rules ldt thershould be is that therea never a debate in the senate about who should leadat the republicans on , you know,te in that body after a couple rounds of failure from the current leader, mitch mcconnell. i m actually pretty glassletely completely full on this debate that we re havin f g. i think kevin mccarthy has done a really good job of trying to build consensus and continue to build support for a speakership, but also these cn 20 conservatives have shown how you can get things done, evenn t when you don t havet fh a majority, you know, as they don t have enough to pickanges who they want forto their speaker. but they do want these rulesfuni changes to helonp have a much more functioning congress. if you think t congre
i think it is t overstated . obviously, it s going to bdiffi difficult. it s going to be very difficult for mccarthye to govern underai any circumstances, given the narrowness of his majorityer ,the fact that we have control, he has control ofof thh the house and democrats stills h control the senate and the white house and thee. bu t i think, honestly, the overall fight is a very i think it s a very good thing. i think it s a very it s a cleansing argument. it s out in the open. it s democracy. it reminds a o me a lot of in a lot of ways of the twenty6 pr sixteen primary where itim was, it was scalding, honest, and that marvelous interview you just did with matt gatesu di a minute ago, it was blazinglyat honest and it was and it wastes pointing out the problem aisinglywith this place, whichsc is spending and this whole debate is about spendinge and it s the entire debate is happening on the republican side. reican sidand the democrat parto dishonest and so corrupt. t they don t they r
spending is destroying this country. and sog ng this y. i still y ends up pulling it out. and when hese does, this is a baptism by debate and he s going to be a much better speaker. and and i think republicans ares going to be better because of this scaldin sg nasty and atertn times entertaining. but but but alt but also a little bit worrisome debate. well, molly, i have to say, the establishment really has no one to blame but itself fort its what it s done and what s whated it s agreed to , that infrastructure bill that that senator cassidy and mcconnell and shelby and all of them agreed to a year and a half ago. and then the omnibus bill thatd they re all celebratintheng in kentucky. i mean, thisucky - is obscen- tl that did bringl it on . i mean i mean, this is what caused all thi ds. ch i do think that the behaviorr sq mitch mcconnell and other uisquishy senate republicans inb helping democrats with their big spending agenda after theset
without any debate if you thinko it could be improved. and i think a lot oft of americs desperately want it improved. a lot of these rule changes will help contribute to a better body of republicanss and some constraints that will help them pass better legislation. aofl, i want to move to couple of different topicsopic really quickly. corey, bush made one of the most ridiculous comments abouf tht byron donald, who obviously was was nominated, as speaker and voted for by ate few people. a now, he s no few t a saying that he s not a candidate, historic candidate for speake r. he s a prop. she said despite being black,bl he supports a policyac agenda intent on upholding and perpetuating white supremacy. o his name being in the mix is not progress. it s pathetic. ix ischarlie, when in doubt, the left smears conservative. minorities. they do it every time and it s just shows that, again, just- a few racists that the last racists in america, caribou s bush is a disgusting woman.