Page 21 - Stuff Up News Today

That segment you just played, he had to retract the statement under pressure. but when it comes to congress, he will have to raise his right hand, be sworn in and testify under the penalty of perjury. these white house folks do not want to testify under penalty of perjury. we have americans testifying under penalty of perjury. if they make stuff up, they can go to jail. no one in the white house wants to put themselves in that situation, as we know, even president trump refused to testify under ...

Period, he was talking about this. stone would reach out to his friend jerome corsi who he was tasking with meeting with julian assange in london. >> is the defense that he was a f fabulist, that he was making stuff up, the defense is that he was a liar? >> yes, and that puts him in a good position, its hard to prosecute a liar for perjury. theyre also saying he didnt have corrupt intention and the prosecution has to prove that. what theyre saying is his corrupt intent was, he knew that if the t...

We need mike pence in the white the overall outcry against them, house. more people attend church, the and he went on and on and on. total incompetency and i will and i felt, willie, youll do you think they play into less likely they are to vote for changing attitudes towards remember this, i felt like i was looking at this president more trump. the more, quote, self-identified closely? and questioning his judgment and eddy murphy in that seen where literacy. >> its actually an insult to everybo...

>> right z. >> what did you think of this? whats your reaction to this letter? >> well, you got to admit trump wrote it. >> to a president, to erdogan. >> with any other president, it would be shocking. its basically sub literal. weve had the monroe doctrine. weve had the reagan doctrine. this is kind of the mr. t doctrine "i pity the fool." you cant make this stuff up, right? >> be a good guy. dont be a toughif guy. dont be a fool. >> susan, beyond the dont be a tough guy, dont be a fool, i wil...

>> you should make fun of it. its subliterate. >> i remember this was in first grade when it was fun with dick and jane. i said that to chris. see dick run. run, dick, run. i mean its that simplistic. >> right. >> what did you think of this? whats your reaction to this letter? >> well, you got to admit trump wrote it. >> to erdogan, to a president. >> with any other president, it would be shocking. its basically subliterate. weve had the monroe doctrine. weve had the reagan doctrine. this is kin...

And frankly, chairman schiff has given them some reason or excuse to do that, something to hang their hats on as they try to do that. i think the point that he was trying to make in that statement is you cant make this stuff up, so you shouldnt make it up. you dont have to, right? and i do think the fact that his office knew about the whistle-blower complaint and he didnt find a way, even though the situation is very technical and there are a lot of legal nuances to actually come out and proacti...

They have been trying to implement and figure out since 2016 basically, how to handle bad content. theres been a change. >> this was only found out by an investigative reporter. he noticed that the terms of service changed on what stuff you can put in a political ad. they took out the section that false, misleading content is allowed. that is de facto been allowed. but the stuff that is -- you can put stuff up for a while now and it can remain up even if its untrue because it hasnt been debunked...

Records of the presidents meetings, calls, and other communications with foreign leaders, documents about the administrations record keeping practices and policies, and all records about efforts by the white house or other executive branch officials to claw back or otherwise limit access to records about officials communications with foreign leaders. so no more locking this stuff up, and certainly no destroying it. this is a voluntary commitment to the court to do this, to preserve these records...

And theres been -- i dont believe theres anything unlawful here or criminal here as it relates to the presidents conduct. >> you legitimately believe he was asking -- you legitimately believe he was asking the president of ukraine to look into corruption writ large but just only happened to mention biden, that that was the only -- >> -- specific about what he was asking, no. no. anderson, i make the -- >> he was specifically asking about the bidens. >> look into biden -- >> right. >> as it relat...

Impeach, we need to impeach them. you have members of congress making stuff up, have members of congress saying we have to impeach because we cant win in 2020. >> so the hypocrisy is from members of congress. >> the hypocrisy here is going all around on this one. >> youre taking a brave stand in calling -- >> the white house staff -- let me finish. to say that the white house staff is the only folks who need to be criticized in this -- >> youre not criticizing them at all. so right now, all your...