But you never know with elon musk. Theres a lot going on, so i thought this might be a Good Opportunity to answer some questions and maybe get some feedback, too. What should we be doing different . I know the bbc, for example, was not thrilled about being labelled state affiliated media. N ot exa ctly. I was going to get that later, but lets go for it now. It has officially objected to that term. Do you want to respond to it . Yeah, yeah. Our goal is simply to be as truthful and accurate as possible, so i think we are adjusting the label to be publicly funded, which i think is perhaps not too objectionable. Were trying to be accurate. I am not the bbc, but. Publicly funded is how the bbc describes itself. So, that would be accurate. If we use the same words that the bbc uses to describe itself, that, presumably, would be ok. I am not asking you for a yes or no, because you are not running the bbc per se, but it seems to pass a reasonability test. So youre going to change those labels
so called smart motorways which use measures such as variable speed limits to improve traffic flows. fourteen stretches of carriageway have already been paused or cancelled because of concerns over costs and safety. at ten o clock we will be here with a full round up of the day s news. first, the interview: elon musk. it s not every day you get invited by one of the world s richest and most influential people to a sit down interview. earlier on tuesday, i d received a response to an e mailfrom mr musk. let s do an interview tonight, it read. just a few short hours later, we were setting up in twitter s headquarters in san francisco. hello, how are you doing? really nice to meet you, too. we are about to go live, very surprisingly, we only just found this out, on twitter, that that is elon musk. we didn t know about that, but you never know with elon musk. there s a lot going on, so i thought this might be a good opportunity to answer some questions and maybe get some fe
but you never know with elon musk. there s a lot going on, so i thought this might be a good opportunity to answer some questions and maybe get some feedback, too. what should we be doing different? i know the bbc, for example, was not thrilled about being labelled state affiliated media. n ot exa ctly. i was going to get that later, but let s go for it now. it has officially objected to that term. do you want to respond to it? yeah, yeah. our goal is simply to be as truthful and accurate as possible, so i think we are adjusting the label to be publicly funded, which i think is perhaps not too objectionable. we re trying to be accurate. i am not the bbc, but. publicly funded is how the bbc describes itself. so, that would be accurate. if we use the same words that the bbc uses to describe itself, that, presumably, would be ok. i am not asking you for a yes or no, because you are not running the bbc per se, but it seems to pass a reasonability test. so you re going to change
usage is dramatically less, so. but the results speak for themselves. the system, despite being at all time highs of usage is fast. it is more responsive than it was before the takeover, and we have also added longform tweets. we ve added. you can now post videos up to two hours, soon videos of any length. we are rolling out our subscriber programme so that people can, content creators can actually make a living on twitter by having some of their content behind a pay wall. and we ve open sourced the algorithm so there is transparency about what tweets get shown, what content gets shown versus not. i think, what are you really going to trust? do you trust some black box algorithm from some other site, or are you going to trust the thing you can see and understand?
dramatically less so, but the results speak for themselves. the system, despite being at all time highs of usage is fast. it is more responsive than it was before the takeover and we have also added longform tweets. we ve added, you can now post videos up to two hours. we are rolling out our subscriber programme so that people can, content creators can actually make a living on twitter by having some of their content behind a pay wall. and we are open source the algorithm said there is transparency about what tweets get shown. what gets shown versus not. i think, what are you really going to trust? do you trust some black box altogether them or the thing you can see and understand? d0 or the thing you can see and understand? or the thing you can see and understand? i. ., .. , ., understand? do you accept there are lots of engineers