Page 11 - Substantive Due Process News Today

The moment. what it should take when you read the opinion on whether or not overturning those is possible? >> not on the basis of the region sitting in this case. justice laid out was very clear proof that i dont how i could be more clear. we are distinguishing away the issue of same marriage, contraception, other issues of sexuality the court has weighed in on price and nothing in this opinion could be used. now this reasoning for anything but abortion. he said we differentiate as a different k...

Abortion reproductive health care. >> access to care to fertility services to emergency contraception. about the criminalization of abortion care and whats to come for other privacy rights. >> the supreme court is a different branch of government. they can look at whatever comes before them. >> in future cases, we should reconsider all the substantive due process, including griswold, lawrence and oversell. decisions on contraception, sex, and same-sex marriage. alitos majority opinion differed, ...

Our patients and medical providers we work with to know whats best for the people theyre serving. i think its not a moment, necessarily, to compromise. our rights are individual and they are deeply personal, and we want to fight for every patient to have the access they deserve. >> the majority opinion, as you know, in the dobbs decision on friday, essentially said this doesnt affect any other substantive due process right. this doesnt affect the ruling in griswold versus connecticut, the right ...

Thanks very much. joining us to discuss, cnn national politics reporter, and elie honig and former federal prosecutor. thanks for being here. the country has changed. since last thursday at 9:59 a.m., before the guns decisions was handed down, our country is fundamentally different in terms of rights taken away. can you speak to the broader implications on the abortion issue on so many other so-called substantive due process rights because, yes, it was just one justice thomas who wrote in his co...

3 of thomas concurrence, thats where it was. no one joined that, but thomas is clearly saying did -- and he used the word duty, we have a duty as an institution to reassess all of these theyre called substantive due process rights but basically contraception, same-sex marriage marriage, you could put interracial marriage. you wrote a book on justice ginsburg, we will remember how she had argued that roe, she wasnt a justice yet, should have been decided on equal protection grounds, not on privac...

Back of biden one seat back to a republican? and its really close. >> trace: i dont think is the only thing the voters are going to have their opinion on printing have a high opinion on inflation. high gas prices. crime. though seem to be the top positions people are having affect them every single day. whats interesting when i hear some of the stars and say they want to leave america and go to europe. if they look at the policies in europe, they restrict abortion after 13 and 15 weeks at much d...

That is what justice thomas is asking for. i guess the good news is that he did not get a single justice to join his concurrence. frankly, he was an outlier on the abortion issue. he is always been an outlier on supplanted due process, and there is no reason to believe he will not continue to work. he is giving encouragement to conservative lawyers across the country to bring these challenges. >> sarah, we heard a little bit about what jennifer had to say in terms of her personal journey on this...

Are today on abortion. the reason that has some vitality is because substantive due process is the legal principle from which all of these rights are derived. the previous right to abortion services and now obergefell, lawrence, griswold versus connecticut, the contraception case, the notion being that there are some rights that are so foundational that you have a right to be protected from the government interfering with those rights. clarence thomas believes thats malarkey. he thinks that ther...

Pursued with patience and persistence to get to where we are today on abortion. the reason that has some vitality is because substantive due process is the legal principle from which all of these rights are derived. the previous right to abortion services and now obergefell, lawrence, griswold versus connecticut, the contraception case, the notion being that there are some rights that are so foundational that you have a right to be protected from the government interfering with those rights. cla...

Legislators passing laws that they knew would not go into effect because they were unconstitutional, but they wanted to stack them up, case after case, looking for the case that would finally break through and permit the supreme court to reverse itself. that is what justice thomas is asking for. i guess the good news is that he did not get a single justice to join his concurrence. frankly, he was an outlier on the abortion issue. he is always been an outlier on supplanted due process, and there ...