summary: Live & Latest News Updates : Vimarsana.com

Bank of Canada officials split on rate cut timing, but agree easing will be gradual

Policy makers remain split on appropriate timing of first rate cut, but there’s more consensus about likely path of monetary policy after that

mike's daughter. >> what bothered me the most was they stayed in mike's house. >> raising the child. >> raising that child and that role of -- >> takes over his life. >> it so creepy. >> percheron a cooperated long- running suspicions that she worked -- she kept a detailed notebook about mike's disappearance and brian anthony's are filling more and more pages in it. she alerted an investigator about her suspicions and shared a 27 page summary of her notes. >> she was a good source of information and she was a bulldog in this. >> like this id. she noted. remember the insurance policies mike bought? they were worth $1.75 million and it was brian who access old mike a large part of them. those waders that surfaced were used by denise's lawyer as evidence to declare mike did in

multiple cameras have to be synchronized. they have take the picture at the same time and just know their locations. if you have that, then you can use mathematics to actually recreate the three-dimensional shape of someone's face. narrator: snapshot uses those photographs and that dna to create a library of known genetic information. then the unknown, so far unidentified dna, is cross-checked across that library by computers billions of times a second. the result is a high-tech prediction of how the unidentified person might look. it's important to remember that the composite is not a photograph. narrator: these composite images were created by snapshot using dna and genetic data from their library. they reveal not just ethnicity, but specific facial features. it's intended to be a description of a person, so it's essentially a summary of the prediction information,

and for the first time, he did a neutral summary. this is a very, very fair judge, but the first substantive words that he said to the jury and i wrote about this for cnn. opinion was that the prosecution alleges a conspiracy, criminal conspiracy to influence the 2016 presidential election. and i think you felt in the courtroom the stakes when the jurors started answering questions everyone understands the gravity of it. and when donald trump got a little out of hand and and was gesticulating, rolling his eyes and carrying on as one juror was being questioned, juror left the judge came down on him like a ton of bricks and wolf. i've never seen donald trump, so dejected he slumped in his seat he is head was dropping you staring and his lap. he felt the gravity as well certainly did laura, we've spoken a lot about trump railing against this gag order what options

able to put on a witness that they won't actually get to cross examination on monday, considering it is a truncated day. it ends at 2:00. if you are prosecuting this case, who would be your first witness and the last witness you would put on in this case? >> so, i will answer by saying who i think it should not be, and who it should not be, is michael cohen. difficult, controversial, potentially not smooth witnesses and i think michael cohen falls into all of those categories. not at the start. it could be somebody who could give an overview of what the case is about and those details get filled in along the way. you always want to end strong. so again, not michael cohen. not a difficult authority witness, but a general, overall summary witness, if you can, at the start. then, you tuck those cooperating witnesses somewhere in the middle. >> talking about thorny witnesses, donald trump declaring when he was leaving court on friday, confirming that he will testify. he didn't make it equivocal in

another $8 billion and their economy is not what ours is. their debt to gdp ratio, you look at the united states, only nine other nations that have a higher debt to gdp ratio than the united states. many of us on the budget commit, economic security is national security. i'm going to be a no on taiwan, no on ukraine. i have a different take on israel, those who blessed themselves in israel will be blessed. a different take on israel. but ukraine and taiwan, you know, i noticed in your clip, talking about europe. americans have put $113 billion into ukraine. and you take in holistic, in summary of all that's been applied by europe they don't match what we singularly put forward there. the question, europe, when are you going to step up and match the united states. griff: that's a great point. so we will have this vote and wondering and waiting to see

confederate heritage month tell us one of the state's former governors is here here are react and explain. next great teammates trust each other. >> we're gonna do a trust falls, stand up before trust what your summary up doc i told you carol, marry me, carrot. about a sale on sky writing important things aren't worth compromising at farmers. we offer both quality insurance and grape savings quick show where the other carrots we are arbors spawn nothing dims my light like a migraine with nortech ott. >> i've found relief. >> the only migrate he medication that helps treat and prevent all-in-one to those with migraine. >> i see you for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura and the preventive treatment of episodic migraine and adults don't take if allergic to merge odi team

appeared to suggest i was in the lead. we were all in good shape and good nick. mark oaten had been exposed on the sunday. 0n the tuesday, an e—mail is sent from the sun news editor. and that e—mail, remarkably, contained a summary of an itemised phone bill from simon hughes's home phone which cannot be obtained legally. there was a payment to a known private investigator. that was used to obtain phone bill data, itemised phone bills and phone numbers. this itemised phone bill showed calls to a gay chat line from simon hughes's home phone. there was a persistent call

brought the jury in for the first time, he did a neutral summary. this is a very, very fair judge, but the first substantive words that he said to the jury and i wrote about this for cnn opinion kenyan was that the prosecution alleges a conspiracy, criminal conspiracy to influence the 2016 presidential election. and i think you felt in the courtroom the stakes when the jurors started answering questions, everyone understands the gravity of it. and when donald trump got a little out of hand and and was gesticulating, rolling his eyes and carrying on as one juror was being questioned juror left the judge came down on him like a ton of bricks and wolf. i've never seen donald trump, so dejected. he slumped in his seat. he is head was dropping you staring carrying in his lap. he felt the gravity as well certainly did laura, we've spoken a lot about trump railing against