Page 5 - Sunset Clauses News Today

Iran deal in january of 2016. and the same question was asked, why would they do that? they do it to derail -- theres a hard-line group that does not want to see any rapprochement with the u.s., and they tend to do these things. and its also embarrassing. look at what zarif did to macron before lining up the g7? he tries to set up this back channel meeting, and before zarif lands, he says ballistic missiles are off the table, were not going to talk about ending subset clauses. -- sunset clauses....

Of the sunset clauses of the agreement itself that are going to kick in in the next few years but also because of other issues of concern that is that are not only raised by the trump administration but i think we have the do need a comprehensive approach in viewing this region not only to look at iran but also to the to look at the structural problems the lack of the regional security architecture that is working and we need really a more comprehensive understanding what is driving geopolitics ...

Something that is unlikely to happen so you know the there is no doubt that the days if you ways and you know vital crisis but we have to move beyond not only because of the sunset clauses of the agreement itself that are going to kick in in the next few years but also because of other issues of concern that is that are not only raised by the trump administration but i think we have we do need a comprehensive approach in viewing this region not only to look at iran but also to to to look at the ...

Our main objective we should not lose sight off is preventing them from getting a nuclear bomb. that is right, we should prevent that but there is a way to do that. by talking to them and making sure they dont think they are going to be destroyed. if they think that their choice is run for a nuclear bomb at maybe survive -- >> the president has a couple issues with the iran deal itself. when you say go back to the negotiation table with no preconditions, the president agreed to that but are you ...

Am i hearing you right? you wanted the violence? >> no, i said i agreed -- im glad that he did not -- >> harris: beside sanctions, what would you do? >> i am sympathetic towards the president, because i do not know that there is much more you can do with sanctions. we are strangling them coming you are absolutely right. >> harris: you have to leave yourself some place left to go. what happens if they come back early july and they start to enrich that uranium? you have to have some place to go. >...

And while were doing that and staying in close lock step with our european allies we have to deter them from military aggression. >> jon: this white house have been incredibly tough on iran. pulling out of the nuclear agreement, also ramping up the sanctions and other things. it seems like the iranians would like to sort of return to the old days when they didnt face the heat from the united states. >> the administration right from the beginning was clear about what was wrong with the nuclear de...

The u.s. was doing everything it could do to disrupt this meeting, you know, on the first of june they made the decision to apply steel and aluminum tariffs on our allies that are attending the meeting. then coming in, the president stands before the cameras and says, why dont we add russia to the group. seriously, russia, who took over for crimea, all the violence thats taken place in ukraine, the poisoning of people in the u.k., the influence in our elections last time period. this is complete...

Conversations should look like when they say they want complete denuclearization. do they want a media? do they want to be progressive and have u.s. forces out of the peninsula? if things dont go according to plan, what is the backup plan? >> maximum pressure. economic pressure with the military option on the table. north korea will only be as strong as china and russia allow it to be or back it up. taking a cue from the democrats, and they saw how we be every india was an iec democrat thing the...

Developments, there were sunset clauses for iran in 15 years, breakout for nuclear weapons and $100 billion to continue their state-sponsored terrorism. how do our allies respond and go forward with supplemental agreements to address important issues? in some ways it strengthens our hand in north korea demonstrating we are serious about a real deal and will hold north korea accountable for deal that suits our national security interests. >> we asked if you agree with his decision to end the nucl...

These concerns that trump has with the iran deal. david mentioned them. one is their malign activities in supporting terrorism, the sunset clauses and the fact that he doesnt think the inspection regime is significantly strong as it should be. i think thats what boris johnson is talking about. but right now, you know, there is no plan b because they havent been able to agree on any of these side agreements. plus the iranians made very clear that it doesnt matter what else the euros might negotia...