Page 66 - Sunshine Task News Today

Into these things. And i think that if you look at the budget they have suggested adding people there. Okay. I think that that will help a lot. Because you know, when you take people away from permitting and inspecting it effects those divisions and so focusing really specifically on code endivorcement is really the way to widle down these outstanding violations. In the current year there were two building inspectors added effective january first. They think that we could not fill them until jan...

Mr. Chatfield. Hopefully i will make it easier. Cause of hearing was developed because because there was a concern had a something coming from the task force, they have already made a decision. So the commission wanted to ensure that that commission or that decision was sort of coming in. The presumption is a violation has occurred when had he come here. So the respondent has to show why the task force was incorrect in making that decision for you to move on the showcause part, not chapter 3. So...

Good afternoon, everyone, the monday, january 14, 2013 meeting of the land use committee. Our clerk is mr. Derek evans. Please make sure to silence all cell phones and electronic devices. All documents included as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will be acted upon in the january 29, 2013 board of supervisors meeting unless otherwise stated. We only have two items on this agenda. Item 1 is an ordinance amending the San Francisco Business Code to permit pe...

This agenda. Item 1 is an ordinance amending the San Francisco Business Code to permit permit expirations and extensions and to modify various fees. We have from the department of building inspection Pamela Levitt good afternoon, pamela levin, Deputy Director administrative services, department of building inspection. The legislation before you is designed it achieve the following objectives. The first is to continue to encourage the growth in the economy by extending the life for review and app...

Stronger bay area. Thank you so much. applause thank you, milicent. Next we have nate blajarzek, cofounder of air b b. It was november of this past year when super storm sandy hit new york. It was an unprecedented event for the region. And in the midst of this disaster, we were really inspired by something we saw within our own community on air b b. Users of the air b b platform were updating their profiles to say if youre a new yorker and you need a place to stay tonight, ill take you into my h...

The law means and not the City Attorney and for some strange reason you want to take the City Attorneys right to interpret it as he sees fits and override the task force that has a legal right to decide. I would say that they both have a legal right. Where does it say in the law that the City Attorney has the right to interpret the sunshine ordinance . Show me in the ordinance . Because he is the attorney. Where in the ordinance does it say that. It specifically says that the task force has the ...

Was a knife that did it so nobody could be held responsible. I have nothing to do with miss patterson and i am not sure that she was working with the Arts Commission at the time that i made the request on behalf of the Library Users association and she had nothing to do and she knows nothing personally about this. It is all what she has heard about. She is the employee of the Arts Commission, and the head of the Arts Commissioner at the very least ought to be considered responsible, and especial...

And after the task force held its hearing and came to the conclusion that you were wrong, did you, consult with the City Attorney. Yes, i did it late, but i did consult again to double check that we acted appropriately and was advised the same advise essentially. Further Public Comment . Is that necessary . I dont know that we need for you to respond. Miss patterson said that they indicated that there were redaction and that is one of the unfortunate things that they did not. You will see that s...

Miss patterson was instructed to do something by someone at the Arts Commission, that if she acted in her capacity as whatever her employment was, she acted in it and it is really the. I think that it is not the figment of the Arts Commission. It is the employee who had the responsibility and who reacted in a certain way. I think that i largely agree with that. Except that i would be a little bit more general. I think that if you sent, the commission has the freedom in my mind to send a represen...

Have. The redactions were two parts, were they okay. And second did they do them properly . Right. Is it better in two in i read the sunshine ordinance, 67. 26. Only deals with redaction. And it does not deal with whether or not the redactions are appropriate. That has nothing to do with 67. 26. 67. 27, is the one that focuses on whether this reduction was proper. All right . And so, that one could one, and i am not sure that we have a basis for saying whether the redaction was proper. Because t...