Latest Breaking News On - Super majority - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

Transcripts For FOXNEWS The Ingraham Angle 20240612

body tapping. >> you know what's then? this is better than cooking at home. i mean, more affordable than groceries, of course. okay. groceries are expensive, but i was in trouble there for a sec. >> you are? well, it's time to make another connection. a game show legend. return break out here. leg warmers, coolers and parachute pants for the ultimate eighties. >> pop culture tribute to 83 show streaming now on fox nation america is streaming. >> thank you, emily, my love. this cat cares. >> laura: good evening, i'm laura laura, "the ingraham angle." the bidens have been able to escape legal accountability for sleazy, corrupt conduct. today their luck ran out. he was found guilty on three charges he faced in the federal gun trial. the angle long maintained while not insignificant, this open and shut case is lease serious of all biden schemes exposed by investigators and receiptors. given we know he was often a drug addled mess who frequented with prostitutes, we ask again, what expertise did he have when china decides to pay him tens of millions of dollars and why have the bidens lied about joe's involvement. they are one of the richest families in politics and no one has explained what hunter, jim or the other bidens did to get paid other than showcasing their connection to the big guy. new speaker: he got 40 million from jim biden, which was 10% ironically, for the big guys of the fees and $200,000 linked from flun pedalling scheme from americorp health. we found a quarter million dollars that joe biden got. new speaker: that is a drop in the buck etand the biden boosters tried to counter any notion that the justice system is unfairly targeting donald trump. new speaker: you have a president of the united states who is living embodiment of the rule of law with respect to his only living son. >> he was a crack addict who had an affair with his dead brother's wife and turned that poor woman to crack, as well. he was convicted in wilmington, i guess delaware is sick of the bidens. joining me is former law clerk to gorsuch and attorney for i.r.s. whistleblowers who say the doj tried to of coer up the tax probe to hunter biden. i have heard some describe this conviction as tip of the iceberg, red herring or fig leaf. what is your takeaway? >> it's a side show, we have this democrat-picked u.s. attorney in delaware, allen weisselberg david weiss who tried to have a sweetheart plea deal. this judge called them out on that and we have gun charges that don't tie to joe biden, only to hunter biden. these are serious charges, hunter biden, 97% of people convicted of this gun charge go to prison for many years. we'll see what happens to hunter biden. >> laura: the case likely never would have been brought or exposed, not been for irs whistleblowers and they were trashed by the regime media. >> yeah, they absolutely were. before they came back and forward, before we sent the letter to congress indicating shapley intended to go forward, they were going to let it die and do nothing. when gary shapley came forward, you see leslie wolf reached out to hunter biden's team for a plea deal. doj and i.r.s. proved massive charges against hunter biden and decided to let them drop one by one. >> laura: given what we knew and what had come to light, it is curious they did not decide to plead this out. given utter disgrace reigning down on the biden family because of everything that has come out as a result of this, were they used to getting away with stuff or thought he could do no wrong or what? >> they flew jill biden back and forth from europe to delaware, i think as show of political force and it seems this delaware jury surprisingly did not go with the power play of the bidens and followed the facts and law here. >> laura: one thing in today's coverage of this is how the media quickly shifted to white w washing the concern about what has bveen done to president trup in state and federal court and isn't this great that the biden family is huddled up together supporting each other. comms director kate bedingfield said this. >> the biden family is close, close knit, they lean on each other. i worked for joe biden for eight years, i sat in the oval office when a member of the office would call him and he would step out to take a call from his family. he puts family first. this is very hard. >> laura: they put family first with money, as well. they had family tragedy, drug addiction is a charge thing. it has been hard for the people who tried to come up against the bidens, including the whistleblowers you represented and no one cared about them. >> hunter biden is suing i.r.s. ident identifying gary shapley and zie ziegler, the subject of the suit and we had to stop doj from taking a dive in this case. that is ome happening because hunter biden is bringing this suit and making outlandish accusations. >> laura: people call tip of the iceberg, red herring. mike calls it a side show. we'll see what happens in the sentencing. if what we saw last nights at the white house, it should be this, joe biden is not the one making major decisions. pre-k >> our freedom can never be secured. >> laura: we checked white house transcript for the transulation, he tried to say she knew as long as history was denied, our freedom can never be secured. he tried to talk about our founding. >> black soldiers were linked in line of patriots, ricked thrisk their lives -- american soil is. quality and freedom. >> laura: then he tried to clap. >> to the people on this side, clap your hands. people right here, clap your hands. people up top, clap your hands. >> laura: the dancing was better, right? >> laura: maybe you could argue it was late, he was tired, i don't think that is today. >> be pro-abolishing the aft. >> laura: i think he meant the atf. byron donalds joins us now. isn't a vote for biden, this is a vote for president harris? >> laura, it absolutely is, because we know it is just not conceivable that joe biden would last another four years. this is not a good situation. people have been having fun with it and laughing about it on social media. it is quite funny. it is sad when you know he is the person that has to engage with world leaders and making so many decisions with respect to what the federal agencies are doing. these decisionings are being made by people never empowered to be the president of the united states. voting for him in this election means giving power to somebody else, that is not what the american people should be doing and look at policy and realize if he was making decisions, they are god-awful decisions that have made our people less safe. >> laura: last night biden seemed to refer to republicans at one point, watch. >> they are all ghosts in new garments trying to take us back. they are taking away your freedoms, making it harder for black people to vote, attacking, diversity, equity and inclusion. >> laura: congressknow ma, using ghost, i don't know if a cute staffer was making an illusion to the kkkor what, did it land? >> no, it is incredibly sad. you have a president and white house and campaign team going to try to sew division and fear and sew that everybody else is tearing down this country when they are the ones that spied on the more than people. they leave our borders wide open. they have destroyed purchasing power of hard working men and women of america and seniors in america. people we should be afraid of are joe biden and campaign. we need a change this november, change is coming in the form of donald trump. >> laura: i wasn't going to mention this, this is important to play this and see how desperate department to put someone like you down because you disagree with them. this is congresswoman crocket. >> if we put people in office, skin folk, not our kin folk, like byron donalds, do you not understand history or because you married a white woman and you think it white wash you. they give him talking points and yes, master, i got it. >> laura: they said the same thing about condoleeza rice a and -- congressman, your response? >> jasmine sits on committee with me, she could have came and talked to me any time she wants to. nobody tells me what to say, everybody says that, i say what i think and speak my mind. policies of her party have been damaging toern ms, been damaging to black americans and americans have a choice, do they learn to tropes and fearmongering and gaslighting of department or are they going to look at policies, what matters in their pocketbook and support republicans this november? that simple. >> laura: thanks so much tonight. coming up next, merrick garland's doj has become its own theme in the babylon bee, i'll explain the hypocrisy. but don't kcritical race th theoryicize them. my angle is next. >> laura: garland's tragic comedy, the focus of tonight's angle. all right, just when we thought comedy was dead, someone from biden's cabinet publishes an oped. merrick garland other than waed everyone to stop being so mean, stop picking on the doj. we've seen escalation of attacks, far beyond criticism and oversight, they are base lsz, personal and dangerous to defund depend investigation, special counsel prosecution of the former president. to quote john mcrenrow, you cannot be serious, the man prosecuting the gop front-runner and warn parents who stand up at school board meetings and warning about traditional athlicks, that guy is upset about criticism? check your constitution, sir, it is congress' job to decide how to spend the money allocated to each department, not up to you and your activists. garland knows this, he just does not care and does not care about the rule regarding audio recordings about classified documents found in his garage. last week garland tried to claim it was an attack on the doj. >> these attacks have not and will not influence our decision-making. i will not be intimidated and the justice department will not be intimidated and we will not back down from defending democracy. >> laura: defending democracy? that is what you call stonewalling legitimate oversight? that man unleashed federal prosecutors and agents, spent taxpayer money to track and intimidate and jail january 6 on . the fact he wrote this op ed is only more evidence of the political nature of everything they do over there. because not only is garland wrong about the law, he fails to address republicans in congress who have cataloged myriad ways he has used doj for political retribution and he calls the attacks false claims in this mes made by those trying to influence the election. that is what he argues. e able to campaign freely without doj interference in a presidential election year that's trying to influence the outcome of an election? that's their argument? who wrote this piece? you see, all we want is for people to be able to vote for the candidate of their choosing. but to garland, and his political hit squad, a trump victory would, itself. be a threat to democracy. wrap your mind around that. we trust the people. but they don't. which is why they want a judge to decide it all and the same reason why they want as many illegals to rush in as possible to eventually vote in a far left super majority. garland's professed concern for protecting institutions and democracy is also belied by the glaring fact that at this very moment, his party is launching a 24/7 campaign to discredit the supreme court. pro-biden activists are secretly tape recording justices in an attempt to delegitimize future court decisions. news flash, by the way, justice alito believes in god, like totally. >> like, people in this country who believe in god, keep fighting for that to return our country to a place of godliness. >> well, i agree with you. i agree with you. >> i support your ruling on dobbs. i support, like, i'm very pro-life, but, like, you know, i don't know how we bridge that gap, you know, like how do we get people. >> i wish i knew. i wish i knew. i don't know. it's not -- i don't think it's something we can do. >> we have a very defined role. >> yes. >> we need to do what we are supposed to do. >> laura: aside from the fact that there is nothing remotely problematic about what alito said remember he said a defined role we play and that's all we can do. does merrick garland support now the secret recordings of justices? >> did people who want to pearl clutch about this, you know, please tell me how we're going to get answers when the supreme court has been shrouded in secrecy and really just refusing any degree of accountability whatsoever, particularly in the face of, you know, what are very like extraordinarily serious ethic breaches. are we going to continue our tradition of secular democracy or led to christian theocracy? >> laura: christian theocracy. they are trotting that out again. in god we trust. christian theocracy. what a vile woman. or just a stupid woman. again, they don't care. the left is going to do anything they can to prop up a man fossilizing before our very eyes. they are going to turn a blind eye as justices are harassed at their homes, only stepping in by the way when a suspect literally planned to kill justice kavanaugh. and they will do nothing as leftist assault law enforcement or deface war memorials, right across from the white house. but they will prosecute three people in connection with skid marks on a pride flag. check out the difference between the two vandalized areas. happened on different coasts but it sends the same message. all fair minded people know what is going on here. the double standard, the irony, the hypocrisy is lost on biden's foot soldiers wh rip into the supreme court. only to claim republicans don't respect the rule of law. >> what size chip is on the shoulder of samuel alito no. grace one of nine human beings sitting for life on the supreme court. there is bitterness, anger and a plan for delayed revenge. these attacks have an overwhelming liquor retrospective and dangerous effect on the very foundations of pillars of democracy. and again, the rule of law is under attack. rachel's words it needs to be protected. so, it was heartening, seems like maybe he was listening when attorney general merrick garland submitted to the "the washington post" today an op-ed that served as something of a public warning. >> laura: protect the rule of law by taping supreme court justices and trying to delegitimize that institution. nice try. you just cannot make this up. do they even realize what they're saying? given how much time these people have spent contorting and twisting the law and the facts, i suggest they just quit their day jobs and maybe join circle da soleil or something. that's the angling. joining me now chris landau former law clerk to justices thomas and scalia and former ambassador to mexico. chris let's talk about the attack on the supreme court at the same time merrick garland is saying stop being mean to me and drying to delegitimize this institution of justice. >> welling laura, it's incredible how he is trying to blur the lines between legitimate criticism of the department of justice and, you know, threats and unacceptable forms of coercion. is he trying to make it seem like the department of justice is immune and imperspective yus to criticism. i mean, this is the most politicized department of justice in the united states history. i mean, this is the first time in history the department of justice is indicting the president's primary political opponent. the double standard has never been more brazen between whom they are prosecuting and what they're prosecuting for and what they're not prosecuting. and the fact that they are not even attempting, not even putting a fig leaf in an attempt to enforce fundamental laws like our border laws. we have never seen anything like this before in american history. for him to say it's beyond the pale to criticize the department of justice is astonishing. >> laura: because hunter is convicted on an obvious gun charge and three different charges, obvious open and shut case, everything that we say about what they're doing to trump is invalid. it's all good now. we're all good. that's kind of what they are doing, chris. >> again, the crazy thing about hunter is what about all the stuff that isn't charged here? i mean, the gun is only -- you knows, the tip of an iceberg of allegations. much more serious crimes and crimes that directly implicate potential crimes that directly implicate the president. which the gun crime, obviously does not. >> laura: right. easy, easy. easy piecey. chris, i want to move on to what the supreme court justices are facing now from the left. again, the same people who say the republicans are attacking fundamental norms and institutions, have no problem activists going on and taping supreme court justices. i don't think anything alito said was anything remotely problematic. your reaction tonight? >> totally agree. >> imagine what at the these people are doing. tasked justice leaders very defined task of interpreting and applying the law this activist says they need political accountability as if they are politicians. that's the whole point. they are judges. they read the laws and interpret them. but, you know, again, this person clearly, in your tape, was asking questions under false pretenses, trying to egg on the justice. and he had a very, i think, appropriate response? but basically, you know, the gloves are off for these people. no blow is too low. and then they claim that everything else is a danger to democracy. i mean, i think it's a danger to democracy when they're failing to enforce the law and they are brazenly, you know, one sided in their application of the law. and what they're trying to imprison the president's chief political rival. how is that not a danger to democracy, laura? >> laura: no, it's a danger to democracy when trump wins. chris, that's the irony of all of this. chris, always great to see you. >> democratic process. >> laura: that's correct. >> that's the threat to democracy. >> laura: chris, thank you so much. all right. who is coming across our border now? you will not believe this. plus, this woman is accused of stabbing a 3-year-old to death. and she is smiling. that's next. ♪ have you ever thought of getting a walk-in tub for you or someone you love? now is a great time to take a look at getting a safe step walk-in tub. with safe step's standard heated seat and new fast fill faucet, you can enjoy a nice warm bath up to 20% faster! and the convenient touch pad control is right at your fingertips. each tub comes standard with a dual hydrotherapy system. the ten water jets can help increase mobility, relieve pain, boost energy, and improve sleep. while the microsoothe advanced air therapy system oxygenates and softens skin. safe step walk-in tubs are built to maximize safety. so you can stay in your home and enjoy the comforts of bathing again. so call now for more information and a free no obligation consultation. >> laura: evil personified. this woman, smirking in court, after being seen on camera and accused of one of the worst crimes imaginable. fox's bill melugin has details. bill. >> bill: this story makes your blood boil. the woman accused of butchering a three-year-old boy can be smirking in court. she was smiling and giggling as she had counts read. >> the defendant did knowingly cause serious physical harm. >> bill: one week after ellis allegedly stabbed the child to death and wounded his 38-year-old mom outside a store in cleveland. the little boy in court could be seen in court while the woman smirked in front of them. >> your honor, one week ago she took everything from us. it is horrendous, i wish no bail period or extend to the max that you can at the very least. do whatever you can to keep this monster behind bars. >> bill: authorities describe this attack as a random act of violence. ellis pleaded not guilty to murder and attempted murder. the judge gave ellis $5 million bond and ordered she remain in custody. she could face the death penalty if convicted. back to you. >> laura: thank you. eight men with icu ties were just arrested after crossing the border illegally. these illegals received full vetting after crossing and no incri incriminating information was tabbed at the time. days, joining me now chad wolf former actinacting dhs secretary, under secretary under president trump. chad, we don't know when these illegals crossed. but we do know that -- the way this is kind of being reported it's like everybody giving themselves a pat on the back for the sting operation, okay. i guess. i guess. but, they should never have been allowed in this country in the first place. >> well, that's exactly right. it's this type of instance that certainly kept me up at night as acting secretary when we had just a fraction of individuals trying to enter this country illegally. so i can only imagine what it is doing or should be doing to president biden, secretary mayorkas and others. but, look, our vetting, i think what this tells you is that our vetting is only as good as the information that we get from countries. and the best information we get are for our allies so country like tajikistan and others we don't get very good vetting so we have a difficult time understanding who these individuals are that are coming into the country. but that's okay. our immigration law accounts for this. and it says actually to detain individuals who are coming into this country and instead of doing this massive catch and then release individuals into the interior of the united states which the biden administration has done. and so whether it's afghan nationals that they papa roll in or these type of individuals this idea we will check them after the fact they get here is the exact wrong approach. >> laura: this entire thing is an utter -- scandal doesn't even describe it, okay? this is the undermining of our sovereignty and now they are endangering -- forget all the economic woes this brings and the cultural problems. the national security damage that this is potentially doing to the country, and, you know, you can't vet. forgetting vetting. we are done. full up. we have 12 million people here illegally. we have no idea who most of these people are there is no vetting. like vetting the afghan refugees. we are not vetting any refugees, bringing them all in and hoping for the best. they cannot continue to happen in this country. >> no, it can't. again, these are the individuals that we actually apprehended. these are folks that border patrol saw. >> how many are there, chad? how many do you think. how many potential terrorists do you think if had you to guest. >> how many tajikistan folks are in that 2 million got away. we have no idea the department has no idea because of their strategic along that border is a complete and utter failure. >> laura: i don't even like to describe it as failure guy the way. i realize i called you under former, undersecretary, sorry, chad. there are great undersecretaries out there but you were the acting secretary. again, guy back to this idea of vetting. they are not vetting anybody. so now biden says well, these people from these six countries can't come in. russia, kyrgyzstan, tajikistan, so they knew this was coming, right? they knew this news was coming. so that news came out over the weekend. that's interesting timing, don't you think? now we have a list of six whopping countries that you can't come in from? >> yeah. i mean they know the countries of concern. they know countries that are not sharing information. so you have no idea, even if you encounter foreign nationals from those countries, you can't vet them because they are not sharing information. we have nothing to base an assessment on. and so they know that. they have known that for some time and the fact that they continue to exempt these individuals and allow folks to come into the country, you are not returning them. this is why you need a different border strategy. you need to prevent people from coming in. those that do come in, you need to both vet them but also detain them during their immigration court proceedings. and none of that is occurring today. >> laura: immediate turnback. go back to trump policy. can't do it. can't vet. our government couldn't get out of afghanistan. okay? we are not vetting anybody. i don't know how many chinese are here, either. chad, you know this is my issue. i get worked up on it. thank you so much for joining us. all right. could conservative victories in europe be a harbinger for what might happen in november? details, next. ♪ we love being outside, but the sun makes our deck and patio too hot to enjoy. thanks to our new sunsetter retractable awning, we can select full sun or instant shade. it's 20 degrees cooler and you get protection from harmful rays and sun glare. when you call, we'll rush you a special $200 discount certificate with your free awning idea kit! you'll get your sunsetter for as little as $799. but, this is a limited time offer! for over 20 years, sunsetter has been the bestselling retractable awning in america! call now for this free awning idea kit packed with great awning solutions. plus, get this $200 discount certificate to get your sunsetter for as little as $799. there are so many incredible styles to choose from. get a custom-built awning, without the custom-built price! turn your patio into an instant oasis. add led lighting for evening enjoyment. call now for your free awning idea kit, local dealer info and $200 discount certificate. “life is better under a sunsetter!” her uncle's unhappy. i'm sensing an underlying issue. it's t-mobile. it started when we tried to get him under a new plan. but they they unexpectedly unraveled their “price lock” guarantee. which has made him, a bit... unruly. you called yourself the “un-carrier”. you sing about “price lock” on those commercials. “the price lock, the price lock...” so, if you could change the price, change the name! it's not a lock, i know a lock. so how can we undo the damage? we could all unsubscribe and switch to xfinity. their connection is unreal. and we could all un-experience this whole session. okay, that's uncalled for. >> laura: this is what the nifty newcomers in paris did after eu v voters delivered a rebuke to pro-refugee globalists. [cheering] >> laura: the "wall street journal" called the parliament election results blow to french and german. stunning defeat of macron and macron left with no choice. >> i'm dissolving the national assembly this evening. >> laura: that sent parties scrambling. whatever happens, the anti-macron sentiment is real. are there similarities to our own upcoming election? more are rejected expensive climate regulation and obscenely high cost of living. douglas murray, "new york post" columnist and fox news contributor. douglas, the bbc, other, you no he, regime media types describe this as disturbing, extreme, or far right victories. what are they not getting here? >> well, several things. one is that media like the bbc have spent years calling all of these parties that have won in the most recent elections eu far right. in fact, they tend to call absolutely everybody slightly to the right of the most green leftist party far right. and now, i mean, the term is losing all meaning across the continent. the second thing is these media keep on saying things like the far right is on the march across europe. there's a boring predictability about that. what you have just shown your viewers, of course is the far left actually marching in europe, the far left this evening actually marching and demonstrating and rioting in the center of paris. i wouldn't expect to see that covered in any of the media in the coming days. >> laura: only ones marching and violent are the leftist who reject the elections. now, douglas, brexit back in 2015 i remember staying up all night watching those election results. a lot of people think that trump victory in 2016. will this pro-populist, pro-nationalist trend in the eu mean the same, perhaps, in 2024? >> it's very interesting question. i think so. and this is why. the main driver of the popular resentment across europe at the moment, that was shown in these election rules, is incredible concern by the population not far rightest, not hard rightest or anything else. but the majority populations. to what they see correctly as just unstopping illegal and legal immigration into the continent. the electorate have for years been trying to sound the alarm at the ballot box, the mainstream parties. and the mainstream parties have just not listened. you know, we have security concerns in a city like paris, which is about to host the olympics. islamist terrorist cell was just found the other day trying to create a spectacular terrorist event. are the french voters hard right or far right? no, they just don't like being blown up. you know, it's a kind of basic sentiment. and because macron and others have failed to answer this -- to answer your question about america. i think we will see something very similar. we know what the situation is on the southern border of this country. we know what the biden administration has failed to do. if the incumbent government does not wrestle with mass illegal population shifts, then people will obviously vote for somebody else. n country that somebody else is very clear. in europe, it's becoming clearer by the day. >> douglas, brilliant analysis of the situation. thank you so much. all right. biden caught in a trans, and what about pickleball? can that save his campaign? yeah, jimmy failla is on it and that's nex i was scared when i was told age related macular degeneration could jeopardize my vision. it was hard, but taking preservision was easy. preservision has the exact clinically proven areds 2 formula recommended by the nei. i'm taking control like millions of others. time for wtf. joining me now, jimmy fail a >> laura: time for wtf, what the failla, joining us is jimmy failla. you can't make it up. a few hours after hunter's conviction for breaking gun laws, president biden spoke about how important our nation's gun laws are. watch. >> president biden: i want to thank you, instead of trying to stop our ban -- they are working like hell to stop it. if they want to think to take on government if we get out of line, they are talking again about, they need f-15s, they don't need a rifle. >> laura: jimmy. >> jimmy: i think what he was trying to say is gavin newsom 2024. this guy is finished. okay. laura, we're not supposed to have the united states president speaking with subtitles below the screen, that is where we are now. a guy in office makes the sign language interpreter shrug. he makes up words, not good. >> laura: the biden team, they are getting pretty desperate, in effort to sway older voters, they are planning a pickleball tournament in virginia, pancake breakfast, bingo in arizona and a phone bank with second gentgaming in new hampshire. that is exciting after seeing him dance. >> jimmy: who does joe consider older? i've seen younger faces on money. idea he thinks anyone is older than him scares me. they are in a desperate spot, they tried buying younger voters, nobody wants anything to do with this. >> laura: are you a pickleball player? do you pickleball with the best of them? >> jimmy: if i can't bet on it, i don't play it or watch it. until they start putting lines on pickel elball, this is a sport for out of shape people. >> laura: summon forgot to push biden's on button, pull the shirt up, there is an on button. watch. ♪ ♪ [♪] >> jimmy: yeah. you know what he looked like, he looks like an amish guy that walked into best buy. so overwhelmed, does not know what is happening around him. two doors down from a guy in a dress, i don't know what we're looking at. if biden does not run for president, he can be in "frozen" straight glitz. >> laura: the first gentleman, he's doing -- there has to be moratorium on anyone who can't dance, dancing and not that kamala was a good darner, she tried a little bit. it is not good to be around people who are good dancers and you are rocking in an awkward. >> jimmy: doug should have froze. this whole administration america's got issues, whole video, just look at it. >> laura: i knew we would get in trouble with this. jimmy will be in new jersey next weekend, follow me on social media. i have rose growing trouble. jesse next. >> todd: a packed city bus hijacked by a convicted felon with a gun leading to one of the wildest police chases caught on camera. we'll show you the pursuit and takedown that brough

really controversial ruling with landmark importance? >> no, this is new. as recently as like five or six years ago, the supreme court still had only a handful of what busters each term. . strategy, and part of it is, that conservatives don't know how long they will have the super majority. it could end at any time. health could get in the way, whatever. a scandal could get in the way.

the supreme court had a handful of block busters each term. 10 years ago, maybe two, maybe three. it has only been since justice barrett joined the court they have escalated here taking on more and more of these huge cases suching them into the last week of june. dropping two or three major ones every day. dropping them a few days in a rosa that you really can't focus on it if you are a regular person. you have a life to live. the supreme court is dismantling say affirmative action. abolishing student loans. killing the administrative state. it is head spinning and difficult to follow and i do think it is a strategy. not a coincidence. the conservatives don't know how long they could have the super majority. it could end at any time. health could get in the way. a scandal could get in the way. >> the scandal has already gotten in the way. >> something could change the way the court is constituted and they want to get it all

row so you really can't focus on it if you're a regular person. it is head spinning and very difficult to follow, and i really do think that it is a strategy and not a coincidence, and part of it is that conservatives don't know how long they'll have a super majority. it could end at any time. you know, health could get in the way, whatever, a scandal could get in the way. >> i feel the scandal's already gotten in the way, mark. >> but, you know, something could change the way the court is constituted, and they want to get it all down now. they learned the lesson when justice scalia died in the middle of a term in 2016 and they had to put a bunch of those cases on hold and set those issues aside for a few years because they lost their votes. they don't want that to happen again, and so that is another part of this tactic is getting this all done as quickly as possible while they've got the votes. they've got them right now, who knows how long it'll last, but they're going to get it done.

i agree with tim! that doesn't- i agree with tim! i that doesn't happen i agree with tim! - that doesn't happen very i agree with tim! _ that doesn't happen very often! i think— that doesn't happen very often! i think the — that doesn't happen very often! i think the policies outlined by the two dominant parties, and labour will basically get a super majority is predicted by the pulse, there is a lot— is predicted by the pulse, there is a lot more — is predicted by the pulse, there is a lot more room to outline a positive _ a lot more room to outline a positive vision of what britain could — positive vision of what britain could be _ positive vision of what britain could be beyond, we are going to have _ could be beyond, we are going to have more — could be beyond, we are going to have more submarines that won't affect— have more submarines that won't affect how — have more submarines that won't affect how people actually live their— affect how people actually live their day—to—day lives, or we will bring _ their day—to—day lives, or we will bring down — their day—to—day lives, or we will bring down net migration, these endless, — bring down net migration, these endless, bitter debates we are having — endless, bitter debates we are having about why we should let people — having about why we should let people in — having about why we should let people in the country, when what is really— people in the country, when what is really happening is people like tinr's— really happening is people like tim's neighbourare really happening is people like tim's neighbour are falling over, being _ tim's neighbour are falling over, being passed around from person to person— being passed around from person to person because there was nowhere to put them _ person because there was nowhere to put them. people are being treated in corridors — put them. people are being treated in corridors. the royal is of were talking _ in corridors. the royal is of were talking about thisjust in corridors. the royal is of were talking about this just this week. it is talking about this just this week. it is not — talking about this just this week. it is not front and centre because neither— it is not front and centre because neither of— it is not front and centre because neither of the two main parties can be honest— neither of the two main parties can be honest about the amount of money it would _ be honest about the amount of money it would take to fix this, the lib dems— it would take to fix this, the lib dems are — it would take to fix this, the lib dems are actually making an effort, and i_ dems are actually making an effort, and i don't — dems are actually making an effort, and i don't think we are seeing that _ and i don't think we are seeing that we — and i don't think we are seeing that. we are seeing are shying away from that— that. we are seeing are shying away from that effort from both main parties. — from that effort from both main parties, and it's demoralising. ithink— parties, and it's demoralising. i think we _ parties, and it's demoralising. i think we will make an effort in government, because of the nhs. if government, because of the nhs. if we government, because of the nhs.

Transcripts for CNN CNN Newsroom Live 20240604 06:15:00

lopez obrador currently has over the governing party may look very different under a claudia sheinbaum administration, we have to remember that and there's manuel lopez obrador founded morena in an essence, he is more anna. and so the way that the governing party reacts to cloudy are coming into power is going to be increasingly an interesting to monitor. and we have to wait and see the competition of congress. i think whether the majority party is ever able to attain a super majority will really dictate how much cloud is shaped, mumble, be able to achieve in the next six years, run cool, so projected to win claudia sheinbaum faces many challenges, including tackling public security and safety concerns, perhaps, uh, perhaps the top concern here, organized crime, energy and immigration how will she deal? with those challenges when we look at her 100 government plan, her political platform, there are several areas where she

Transcripts for CNN CNN Newsroom Live 20240604 07:06:00

continue to play during her six-year term. and what that means for her internally with the governing party, the grip of power that andres manuel lopez obrador currently has over the governing party may look very different under a claudia shame bomb administration, we have to remember that unders manuel lopez obrador founded morena and in essence, he is more and so the way that the governing party reacts to cloudier coming into power is going to be increasingly an interesting to monitor. and we have to wait and see the competition and if congress, i think whether the majority party is ever able to attain a super majority will really dictate how much cloud is shaped. mum will be able to achieve in the next six years run cool, so projected to win claudia sheinbaum faces many challenges, including tackling public security and safety concerns. perhaps perhaps the top concern ben here, organized crime, energy and immigration how will she deal with those

Transcripts for MSNBC The Saturday Show with Jonathan Capehart 20240604 04:44:00

hate does not become law. >> u.s., as i mentioned before, raking last year's record for the number of anti-lgbtq laws enacted. i keep wondering, why is this happening now? >> i think it is cynical politics, if you want my honest opinion. the extreme right figured out an issue where they can take advantage of the fact a lot of people do not know trans people, not aware of the struggles of trans people, passing off misinformation as truth and as a result, they are getting people whipped into a frenzy. i think it is genuinely cynical politics and effort to score cheap political points. >> every time lambda presented the case before the supreme court, you won. how concerned are you that this supreme court, with its 6-3 conservative super majority, will strip us of our rights? we just saw this in dobbs, the

Transcripts for MSNBC The Saturday Show with Jonathan Capehart 20240604 22:44:00

make sure hate doesn't become law. >> the u.s. is already breaking last year's record for the number of anti-lgbtq laws enacted. why is this happening now? >> i think this is cynical politics. the extreme right has figured out an issue where they can take advantage that a lot of people don't know trans people. are not aware of the struggles of trans people. they are passing off misinformation as truth. as a result, they are getting people whipped into a frenzy so i think that it is genuinely cynical politics. >> every time lambda has been part of a case before the supreme court, you have won. but how concerned are you that this supreme court with its 6-3 conservative super majority, will strip us on the rights?

Commentary | State Rep. Gina Galfetti: Vermont Legislature is on a dangerous course