In a separate ruling, the Supreme Court unanimously is ruling that philadelphia must accommodate a Catholic Foster Care Agency that is refusing to place children with samesex couples. Big issues at question there. Jessica schneider is live In Washington with all of the details as they come in. Focus in on the obamacare ruling, please. The Supreme Court saving the Affordable Care act, once again this morning. Doing it with a2 decision. The latest challenge of the law, that was put in place, the latest challenge is invalid because the justices are saying that the plaintiffs here, including republicanled states, didnt have the injury, or the legal standing, to bring this case. The Affordable Care act remains in effect. And the 20 million that have conch coverage under obamacare, they will continue to have coverage because of the Supreme Courts decision this morning. Its possible that republicans or other plaintiffs might find a way to challenge this law at some point. For now, it stands.
Evening, take a look. Hundreds of people with candles and flowers gathering to mourn the death of this titan of justice. Ginsburg, only the second woman to serve on the high court, now more on the legacy of ginsbu ginsburg, juju chang. All i ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks. Reporter barely 5 feet tall, but a liberal giant. Only the second female justice named on the Supreme Court, serving there for more than a quarter century. Her path to the highest court in the land was not easy, as one of the few women at harvard law school, she faced discrimination after graduating from columbia in the 50s. Her tenaciousness highlighted in rbg, produced by julie cohen and betsy west. She was one of five women. And the big law firms just werent hiring women. Not a law firm in the entire city of new york bid for my employment. Reporter charging forward, she became a beloved law professor at rutgers and worked as a lawyer for the aclu and mapped out a legal strategy to F
Sector trading higher and you also have the tech sector higher , both up more than 1 . You want to see those financials and Industrial Companies take the lead and that is exactly what is happening today. Another way of looking at that is the reopening trade is doing well, even as this years defense is holding its own. David the one thing that does not move at all our bonds. It seems like the fed has nailed those to the floor. Abigail it is amazing that we have had bonds trading in this range. It does feel that the fed they have even said they have nailed them to the floor until 2023 unless there is a risk off scenario that would cause a bid to bonds, which would mean yields would fall lower. You may see yields hang out in place. It is interesting, your point is proven today because you have the major averages up more than 1 , up for a third day in a row and yet bonds are basically flat. On a day like today you would want to see bonds selloff. That could also signal anxiety around the d
Surveillance and the sort of central question i want to think about today is can intelligence agencies operate in a Democratic Society and be successful at protecting the government and its citizens while also upholding those same Citizens Rights . Especially the right to dissent. In other words, are liberty and procurity compatible . No doubt, there is a need for intelligence communities to operate. Threats exist from foreign and domestic sources, those threats are real. They have been real throughout u. S. History and they can come from across the political spectrum. But for over a century, in addition to taking real threats to the lives of american citizens, bureaus and agencies within the United States government have surveilled those who have expressed what the Cato Institute described as, quote, Strong Political views that run count toer to the prevailing government paradigm. This challenges the notion by those who support a state of some sort if you have nothing to hide, you hav
Landmark cases. Cspans special history series produced in cooperation with the National Constitution center. Exploring the human stories and constitutional dram as behind 12 Historic Supreme Court decisions. As behind 12 Historic Supreme Court decisions. Number 759, earnest miranda Petitioner Versus arizona. We hear arguments from number 18, roe against wade. Quite often in many of our most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 Million People who helped stick together because they believe in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspans history series landmark cases. Tonight is number 10 in our 12part series and you will hear about the 1962 tennessee reapportionment case and it was one that earl warren called the most important of his tenure and remember this is the court that wrote brown versus the board of education and well learn