Latest Breaking News On - Surprise you - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

him, is, you know, thousands and thousands and thousands of prior inconsistent statements, that the polite way of saying lie, prior bad acts. he is taking the stand -- if he takes the stand it's a deathknell to the case. he is unpredictable and has a lot of hubris. look at the case with e jean carroll where he decided that he could do it better than his lawyers and the judgment went from $5 million-$85 million. if he proceeds, i don't think he will help himself. >> some of the reporting won't surprise you, that prosecutors want to cross-examine him about lawsuits he has lost, taxis made on women, where if you are in the jury, that's a lot of context. tomorrow, everybody convenes at 9:30, opening statements, maybe do we have time to hear from a

questionnaire does well which is why it's used in this case. if there's something that's going to give you a greater level of insight into someone's political leanings, in a way that might allow an attorney on further voir dire to preb and then find out is this going to prevent you from being fair and impartial, i think it's appropriate. >> there are two attorneys that have been seated as part of the jury so far. catherine, does that surprise you, and do you feel like those members of the jury would look at the evidence in this case differently than an average person. >> there are lawyers and already lawyers. a bankruptcy lawyer knows nothing about critical criminal. a criminal law knows nothing about bankruptcy law. it was my practice not to put a lawyer on a jury. >> why is that. >> stereo types. you think too much. i think of myself, i would be sitting there going object, why

Selwood House Care Home in Charlton Down Oscars event

Residents in a Dorset car home were inspired by the glitz and glamour of the recent Oscars, that they held their own event

there to uphold. so, the investigation by the bbc has prompted some concerns and thoughts for me as to how the regulator should be better looking into supporting pharmacies to carry out their practice. supporting pharmacies to carry out their practice-— their practice. does this surprise ou, their practice. does this surprise you. seeing _ their practice. does this surprise you. seeing this _ their practice. does this surprise you, seeing this happen? it's i their practice. does this surprise i you, seeing this happen? it's going to surprise a lot of people but lots of other people will say, i couldn't get to the pharmacist, i could do it online, it's quicker, and i can get what i want. online, it's quicker, and i can get what i want-— online, it's quicker, and i can get whatlwant. :, , �* , , , what i want. so, it doesn't surprise me that more _ what i want. so, it doesn't surprise me that more people _ what i want. so, it doesn't surprise me that more people are _ what i want. so, it doesn't surprise me that more people are accessing online services but what we know is that digitisation and i'm going to say it, amazonification of health care, people see medicines as retail and then not, they need to be carefully prescribed.— carefully prescribed. you're absolutely _ carefully prescribed. you're absolutely right _ carefully prescribed. you're absolutely right but - carefully prescribed. you're absolutely right but does i carefully prescribed. you're absolutely right but does it| absolutely right but does it surprise you that these online pharmacies, the scrutiny is so low

Surprise You Sale a Buffalo tradition

For decades, the Christmas season didn’t start in Buffalo until the annual Surprise You Sale at St. Luke’s Episcopal Church. Even the lights along Main Street wouldn’t be lit until

The Zero DS And DSR Electric Motorcycles Are Better Than Ever For 2024

any of the sunday shows yesterday? why won't they answer the questions and joe biden avoid the questions? when he answers them he lies to the american people. the american people just deserve the truth and nothing but the truth. >> dana: did anything shokin say to brian kilmeade surprise you, add anything to the story? >> well, certainly having his testimony or his speaking to brian kilmeade on fox news, sharing that information, very important. i want to talk to shokin next. i would like to see evidence he has aside from joe biden saying in a microphone several years ago bragging about firing shokin. i would like to see if he does have any evidence of this because every time joe biden has answered the question he has lied about it. because the oversight committee is not allowed to show the suspicious activity reports from the treasury because they are confidential we have to go after bank records. i would like to know what banks we need to be talking to and what banks do we need to request financial records from to show

>> i'm uncomfortable with what i read last night. i think that this conduct is basically covered by the federal indictment. election interference is election interference, it's been charged by jack smith. i would have less of a problem with this if she decide, okay, i'm not going to charge donald trump here because he's been charged, essentially this conduct, by jack smith. but giuliani and meadows and others have not been charged at the federal level. that would be a more defensible indictment, i think. >> did that surprise you, to see chris christie taking that stance? >> well, the digital bit. because these comments and obviously the comments of governor desantis and many of the other candidates who are running, republican candidates who are running for the nomination, sound like people who are resigned to donald trump being the nominee. i think, this really underscores how much this is donald trump's party. we have evidence over the course of the last, you know, a

as you said, erin, my guess is that there are some additional facts that would be further proved of the allegations that we will find out about at trial. >> so when he went through everything and all the information that you had, you recommended criminal charges, a recommended investigation. i'm curious, when you go through this, he did not charge trump with a seditious conspiracy, inciting a mob, those charges are not in here. does that surprise you, or does that disappoint to? >> no. he charged the two lead councils, the exact too that the select committee referred for his consideration, the obstruction of -- and conspiracy to defraud the united states. seditious conspiracy, we consider did not include that in our criminal referral. that requires a prosecutor to prove intent to use force. there is evidence of that against the proud boys and oath keepers. we look very hard for evidence that the president was in communication with or somehow

she has gathered in an indictment. this is pretty detailed. but as you said, erin, my guess is there are some additional facts that would be further proof of the allegations that we're find out about. >> so when you went through everything and all the information you had, you recommended criminal charges. you recommended investigation. i'm curious. when you go through this, he did not charge trump with seditious conspiracy, inciting a mob. those charges are not in here. does that surprise you, or does that disappoint you? >> no. he charged the two lead downs are the exact two that the select committee referred for his conversation, the construction of official proceeding and conspiracy to fraud the united states. seditious conspiracy we decided it did not include that. that requires a prosecutor to solve intent to use force. there was evidence of that against the proud boys and the oath keepers.