Page 365 - Surrender News Today

Years and years whole cities were destroyed in the united states, the media never talked at all about china. now that were actually pushing back against china, and protecting american jobs there is suddenly discussion of consequences. surrender is the one place we cant bear. reporter: i need to ask you about immigration. these new family detention centers and the role announced by the active secretary homeland security last week how long do you plan to detain these people because there was such ...

Initially seemed to indicate that he did and were wondering did he hear the questions which were asked numerous times properly, was he asking luck with the media what was going on there? >> i can tell you john with absolute 100% confidence the only second thoughts the president was having is whether to be even tougher and even more aggressive with the tariff schedule on china, and ive spoken to the president about this this morning, and coming straight from him when i tell you the president was ...

Help. that was a surrender flag in this war. thats him saying im out. i need you guys to fix it for me somehow. >> here you see the tweet from george conway, one of the most acute critics of the president of the united states. his tweet today said the president of the united states is psychologically decompensating before our very eyes. heidi przybyla, i know youre not a psychologist but you live in washington, d.c. and astute student of the president. its been a long time since i lived there bu...

Converging. because the living constitution as the original progressives talked about it was an evolutional product, not revolution air bu ari but overte would agree up. incorporate anything in the old constitution that was valuable and worthy, they never thought they would come to a fight, because they would grow together. but, then the 60s, happened. and instead of growing together, the liberals radicalized and conservatives in react to them in their open way radicalizes instead of a surrender...

Why were there. its very clear we need to bring this to a close. now, we may need some kind of special operations or intelligence capability like we would in many hot spots around the world to protect american interests. right now the only way that we can get to that withdrawal, bring this thing to a close, is to have a political settlement that has the parties at the table. while its good to hear that there are talks going on, its concerning to hear those talks are leaving the afghan government...

Around the world to protect american interests, buright now, the only way that we can get to that withdrawal, bring this thing to a close, is to have a political settlement that has the parties at the table. why its good to hear there are talks going on, its concerning to hear that those talks are leaving the afghan government at the sidelines. >> lets turn to the economy. you just heard my interview with the president trade adviser, peter navarro. president trump says taking his tariffs off chi...

To be a supporter of terrorism and thats why we went into afghan because of the support from al qaeda during the 9/11 attacks. the policies, the strategies, the military approach has changed a lot over these 19 years and everything we talked about is going to contribute with both sides in the united states are going to continue as problematic. >> a source close to the talks told cnn the taliban is insisting the cease-fire is solely with the u.s. but there are security agreements with the afghan ...

Surrender to the taliban. there will be others that will say were throwing the afghan nation and the afghan government -- >> its a betrayal. >> also there are going to be many people that say keep the security forces there to contribute to counterterrorism con tlikt. but this is part of the negotiation, both sides, republicans, democrats, left, right, anti-war, pro-security, will see challenges with. youre right -- im sorry. >> we only have a minute. i wanted to ask you one other question becaus...

Afghanistan. we would go from about 15,000 troops to 8,000 or 9,000 under this plan. it would also involve a ceasefire between the u.s. and the taliban. but crucially it would not involve any kind of cease fire between the taliban and the afghan government. so that has also led to some fears that this would allow the taliban to take aim at the afghanistan government without u.s. intervention. so allies are raising concerns that this preliminary peace plan represents something of a surrender. lin...

Earlier this month, the u.s. government officially labeled china for the first time ever, a currency manipulator. another promise kept. while others allowed china to freely loot the u.s. economy,ot $500 billion a year, not million, not million, billion! with a b! weve made it clear that the theft of american jobs and american wealth is over. yet today "the wall street journal" editorial board, and some others, continue to publish foolish articles that demonstrate that they understand nothing abo...