deputies under scrutiny would face serious leadership questions. or the unemployment line. so what kind of leader is president barack obama? let s ask democratic strategist ryan clayton and columnist for the town hall and republican strategist, scotty nell hughes. ryan, i saw you shaking your head. is the president in trouble? another week, another scandal. judge jeanine: that is my line. what is really going on throughouts country if you get outside of the bubble and outside of the television studio most americans are in scandal shock. jumped the shark this time. judge jeanine: what does that mean? gone way too far. americans are are going congress review board whether you going to get america back to work and fix is the problems. introduce me to the people that want congress to get back to work. i think we elected them to get
shazad was identified by an alert street vendor. by the way, mr. president, isn t the war on terror over? you said that just the week before last and you also said don t blame blame me, bush did it. mr. obama didn t you object to bush s doing it when in truth you expanded it? if it is all legal and bush did it why is q4 director of national intelligence clueless clapper there saying we are not supposed to know about it when your defense is that we already knew about it? he said the unauthorized disclosure of this important information is represent prehencible and risks important protections for the security of americans. okay. should i now assume that the reporters who broke the story will have their heads on the obama chopping block for releasing that information that we already knew about? and since our enlightened attorney general eric holder now says the justice department goal is to prosecute government
dad? i welcome this debate. and i think it is healthy for our democracy. i think it is a sign of maturity because probably five years ago, six years ago we might not have been having this debate. judge jeanine: okay, it is about maturity. not about the fact that you said that our privacy need not be invaded in order to pro text us from terrorism. mr. president, does the narrative change depending on what americans find out? has our government become so political that there are no issues, only sides? you are going to protect truss terrorism. when you find out about terrorism like benghazi you don t do anything anyway. the guy you think is responsible for benghazi is still walking around in flip flops flipping us the bird drinking his strawberry cocktail and daring us to come after him. and most of the time, mr. president, you won t even call it what it is. muslim terrorists. remember that guy working at
officials and not the press does that mean you will prosecute leon panetta for leaking the name of the unit commander of seal team six instead of those who told us about our phones and e-mails? you remember leon panetta. the guy who thinks it is 1923 and a ten engine prop can t get to libya in time to save american lives. back to the surveillance. i may be picky but the pesky united states constitution requires some indicia of wrong doing before you can survail americans. i have an idea. how about we increase the size of the federal government, add another agency to oversee the possible abuse of the surveillance. and if it is essential that you have this information to protect the nation against terrorism and whether suspected terrorists have been in contact with persons inside the u.s., how is it that you missed the boston bomber and his repeated contact with jihadi mom and
you are in charge! while your fellow americans are losing their jobs and their health insurance and their homes you do not spend $4 million at a conference for which there is no accountability. judge jeanine: that was congressman jason chaffetz as well as tre gowdy from the house joa oversight. $125,000 for event planners. $17,000 for an art person. art teacher who draws while he is on stage. and $11,000 for a happiness expert. it is the public that needs the happiness expert after we see how much the irs wasted our money. with me is a former commissioner of the irs mark everson from indianapolis. all right, mark. what do you think i mean i m kind of at a loss