the republican establishment. he wants to go to war, almost establish himself as an outside independent type person. what s the practical impact? you had mitch mcconnell publicly being a little bit vanilla and milk toast in his comments but privately saying dude, i only got 52 republicans to work with here. i don t need you running off bob corker. the question is whether this is a slow burn or are we going into a fast burn. bob corker is talking the way most of the senators talk in private. he brought it out publicly. all the senates you discuss in the opening statement, to my knowledge believe the president is to some degree unstable to use bob corker s word. the big to me is when do we see more fishers? when do we see more breaks and when do we hit a tipping point where the republicans in the senate actually come to a public agreement that the president is
and he doesn t realize that you know, that we could be heading toward world war iii with the kind of comments he s making, and it s like he it s like it s an act to him. again, it s bob corker warning the president s rhetoric could be leading us toward world war iii. most republican senators wanted to move past the comments and get back to work. chuck grassley said i don t see how it s productive and i think two words would answer your question from my point of view. cool it. i think it would help if the president would be the first to cool it, and i think it would be better if we stuck to the issues and leave personalities out of it. marco rubio responded. quote, you ll have to ask senator corker what led him to make that statement. i haven t made the statement. senator jeff flake said any of us who have worked with senator corker know he speaks his mind.
democrats are welcome to wade in and watch, by lee smith, and it s extraordinary, lee smith says, that reporters in new york around harvey weinstein, they knew all along and they can say whatever they wanted to say. they knew this was happening all along and i think the most remarkable story is this woman who asked harvey ween stein a question pack in 2000. he didn t like the question and he started screaming, he was verbally abusive to her. then physically abusive to her boyfriend, beat him up in front of 20 reporters and photographers and none of those pictures ever saw the light of day because harvey weinstein owned them all. i mean, this sounds like turkey, actually, or it sounds like russia. i can t believe that anybody would have that much power and there would be this many people that were such cowards and so
from the investigation, as i conveyed to you from the very beginning in in your zest is some things are going to change. they are minute changes. there is not this all encompassing answer associated with the information that we ve presented before. in other words, it s not completely inaccurate. but what we have learned is mr. campos was encountered by the suspect prior to his shooting to the outside world. it was previously reported that bullet holes were found in a nearby jet fuel tank. investigators believe they were targeted possibly as a diversion a. motive has yet to be found, a lot of people asking the question after the security guard was shot and told security why that message was fought relayed to police as to exactly where the shots were coming from until much later and the shooting had begun from that window. we are also following a state of emergency in california this morning as more than a dozen
unregulated, they are essentially free to decide how they operate is over t. question will be, what do you go after? what do you protect? i think that issue is emerging big time. i think it will be something that left and right we ll both start targeting. i think you are absolutely right. we seen that focus on this issue start in the last week, where it goes over the next few months will be important. we don t want an over reaction. that s always the risk in these situations. gene robinson. my question is just that how do you do this in a constitutional way? how do you protect freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of association and those basic freedoms and at the same time give law enforcement license to root around in a way that some people would say would see as intrusive? you know, it s a tall order and this is a real moment in american history given that