founder and editor of talking point memo. this has not been sold as a liberal dream and yet it would seem like a lot of spending and a lot happening here on biden s terms. yeah, i mean this is they really worked hard on this. it is talked about as infrastructure when people think of service transportation but it is a huge investment in climate. it is a major, major addition to the social safety net. it is a huge, huge thing. there is no question it is still a lot of a long way to go it is a big, big deal. katty, people like me sometimes are rightly mocked of criticized for saying everything is raking and everything is big. i get it. on the screen people will see that we are monitoring the house
Tweet
The right to keep and bear arms longs predates the invention of guns. Originally, it encompassed spears, bows, swords, and so on. It was long held that a man had a right to defend himself from attack and, as such, had the right to have whatever tools he could afford to use in that effort.
Hence, the right to keep and bear arms.
However, not everyone agrees. Some people think the right to keep and bear arms is really about states despite the Second Amendment’s use of the term “people’s right.” It seems people only mean people and not states when it’s convenient. Some people think the right is entirely fictional.
AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley
South Carolina and Missouri are two states taking an interesting approach to sanctuary efforts. Rather than simply make a statement, they’re considering laws that would allow residents to pretty much have whatever is currently legal to them under laws that would create state-sponsored militias.
While many don’t like the term “militia,” that’s basically what they are and I’m fine with it. I think it’s an interesting approach.
For some, like the folks over at
The latest attempts by state legislators to circumvent potential federal gun legislation follow a decades-long history, according to Mark Pitcavage, a senior research fellow at the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism and a long-time analyst of militias in the United States.
it is a talking point memo from jake sullivan to hillary clinton and cheryl mills, and in it he is prepping her for a phone call with a senator and my best guest is senator john mccain. todd: let s read this from jake sullivan, and cheryl mills, the white house and susan were not making things up. they were going with what they were told by the intelligence community and the real story, an obvious view from the start and an assault by heavily armed militant, the intel community gave different information. explain what that message is. what does that mean? you read jake s 11 prepping hillary to lie to the senator. that statement was a lie. let s revisit what happened in ben garvey, four americans were
this is an affluent place where san sanman can afford higher p.r. firm in this particular case, i don t know, what do you make of the fact that this has became an issue, to make a political statements with their presence but who are now saying they re just kids. well, actually i think when you look around the media, there are a lot of very difficult reaction from catholics to all of this. there are a lot of catholics who were particularly disturbed by the disrespect show to the native american. that s an important piece of this people who watch the whole video, people like jonathan or josh marshal at talking point memo who wrote a great piece on this it is fair to say that some of