Present priority 8 which is the engagement of the benefit agreement in last year fiscal year the youth stressed the problems of job Employment Opportunity for San Francisco young people by including the youths awhile norwalk contracts with new bayshores and the Youth Commission pass this with the same intent as the board of supervisors this year the Immigration Committee wanted to passing passes that a Community Benefit agreement is a contract with any company residing in the Central Market past the tenderloin who state of the art exceeds one. 5 percent inclusion for exchange of the Civic Engagement weve researched and met with the cities Administrators Office and the liaisons from Different Companies weve toured companies to see what they offer to the communities, however, the youth to fully understand the potential were hold a youth town hall on june 11th from 9 to 3 00 p. M. That includes during the course people to the midmarket area and city hall at the working groups and give the
Youth town hall so we can accurately describe with that said, id like to pass to an to the next commissioner. Hello supervisors my name is precious the Youth Commissioners if i ask all of you today what you think are the most basic necessities that Everyone Needs youll probably respond with food and water and shelter and an education unfortunately 19 to 35 hundred youth in the city dont Center Access to 1, 2, 3 of the basic necessities that is why we want to urge you to declare 2015 as recognizing Homeless Youth this priority wouldnt have been potential without larkin a provider for youth theyre here today i want to shout out and through our partnership we found out there are not enough available resources for Homeless Youth again as mentioned there is 3 hundred and 50 beds available for Homeless Youth and roughly 19 hundred to 35 hundred Homeless Youth it didnt add up so if we analyzed the true mean of those numbers theres actually one in 3 one out of 3 Homeless Youth in our city or i
Committee will come to order. Welcome to todays commerce, justice, and science subcommittee hearing examining the department of justices disco year 2016 budget request fiscal year. Let me welcome Loretta Lynch to her first hearing before this subcommittee as she assumes the important spots ability of serving as our nations chief Law Enforcement officer. Welcome. As you begin your twoyear term as attorney general, i believe it is critical for you to return the office of attorney general to its constitutional purpose which is to enforce the laws of the land, not the degrees and winds of the president. The president has a white House Counsel and pretty plenty of attorneys arguing for his point of view on immigration environmental regulations and more. The attorney general, i believe, is the servant of the loss and citizens of the United States, not the president. I want to encourage you, madam attorney general, to consider this perspective carefully as you begin your service in a job that
The resources may be there and available for the cities, that smaller communities, we are losing it young people. It can be so significant to the health and morale and safety. I would ask that you work with us. I have other questions i would like submitted for the record. Most specifically with the codification of the brady obligation and statute. I would like further followup on that. Senator last year, we had the victims of child abuse act we reauthorized both programs. Childrens Advocacy Centers funded do interviews. They are respectful of the delicate needs of childhood victims of abuse. I was disappointed to see the budget only ask for half of the money to keep these programs. Is been your experience with childrens advocacy programs . Loretta lynch senator, my experience has been based primarily with my experience as a u. S. Attorney. We found the childrens Advocacy Centers to be extremely powerful. It has been in dealing with children who may be related to victims of human traffi
Alternatives to alcohol related activities such as the proliferation again of gyms, health clubs and i think for every block in this city has a yoga studio on it. Clubs are sitting empty south of market as a result and a change from the current non conforming status to that is not going to make a difference. Changing from non conforming to has a right fully permitted is not going to allow the clubs to be any noisier, to be anymore outrageous in terms of their impact on the neighbors. Either way theyre zoned the same standards are going to apply, no difference. Down zoning the neighbors which most of these options would result in is not going to stop them from complaining whether they are fully permitted or non conforming, conditional use, the neighbors have every right to complain if a venue is out of compliance. Basically this has been written into law for a thousand years. The basic mans home is his castle now translates down to everyone is entitled to the peaceful and quiet use and