Jeopardy. Because those are the very things that create those jobs. And if we are forced to go out of business, if were forced to move, if were forced to curtail hiring and if we are forced to downsize and if we are forced to eliminate a lot of optional benefits that people dont consider that happen at the smallbusiness level, where they operate more like familis and benefits that are extend to employees that are not part of sort of the general conversation, but have real value. Whether its paid timeoff. Whether it be help when help is needed when there is someone sick or someone needs a break . So we could force ourselves into a situation where all of those kinds of discretionary benefits just cant even be offered because they are not economically possible. It could eliminate profitsharing. It could eliminate the hiring of entrylevel employee because im already paying a wage for someone with experience, so why would i hire someone who doesnt have experience . So as an altruistic as yo
Im dr. Edelman a former Task Force Member and a cofounder of the open house and the cofounder to the private practice in the city and i want to thank all of my colleagues for all of the hard work that went into the Task Force Recommendations, and special shout out to dos. For all of their support, and we could not have done the work that we did with the task force could not have done the work that we did without their support. I want to talk to you this morning about a crisis. That the city and the Lgbt Community is facing together. And it is in demencika, do not let your response to this crisis be lost in the urgent and important recommendations for housing security and affordability and other much needed services. By 2020, the total population of older adults in San Francisco living with alzheimers disease will be 26,774 older adults. And another ten,000 people will be living with some other form of dementia. Using the citys 12 percent estimate of the lgbt senior population it can be
Needed when there is someone sick or someone needs a break . So we could force ourselves into a situation where all of those kinds of discretionary benefits just cant even be offered because they are not economically possible. It could eliminate profitsharing. It could eliminate the hiring of entrylevel employee because im already paying a wage for someone with experience, so why would i hire someone who doesnt have experience . So as an altruistic as you would like to be, altruism can be stymied by the bottom line and if there is no bottom line, a lot of these things could be in jeopardy. This issue is a very significant one for traditional, small, independentlyowned business as we know them today. Whether these changes are inevitable over time is debatable. But certainly were looking a scenario which would so dramatically accelerate them and outside of any kind of timehorizon for planning. That is one of the big issues there is no time to plan for this. Going to 13 an hour on january
And are turning to the u. N. For help. Game an, at the eve of americas world cup match against general yerm ni, we talk about the low down. And we begin with the Supreme Courts decision on cell phones. Not about the devices put privacy and personal information, and what Law Enforcement needs to prove and show. Roxanna reports on the ruling and reaction. The justices pointed out that part phones can hold quantities of personal information, and searching them violates rights to prif assy. The Justice Department argued Police Needed to check cell phones because they are used for criminal activities. If the Police Pulling over, they are allowed to search anything in plain view. One thing they cant search is your cell phone, because they hoed personal information. Justice john roberts wrote in a rule . Technology is advance. So of your personal life can be accessed that has nothing to do with your criminal case. A brief was wild arguing cell phone searches can compromise how jobs are undert
That will be great, thank you. Commissioner antonini. Yes. A few comments appreciate the presentation. I notice theres talk about bus Rapid Transit busing this area i speak against light rail if youre going to have 12 thousand hoping people and homes theyll have to get off the t and get on another bus it didnt makes sense it is a clean slate we can do whatever he want we dont have the usual problems but i also can you remember you to enclosure the possibility which having that continue out to the north through cargo and connect up with third street someone wanting to reach that area from downtown will have to go all the way to t to the end and came back the connect our so in another area we may have a problem the bridge were going to spend a lot of money to build anothers only for business not automobiles that didnt makes sense driving through Hunters Point to Hunters Point shipyard is a long way to go to visit a neighbor and nobody will walk or take Public Transit or bike there are pe