ukrain because i can only imagine the conversations he had. and the firing of ambassador yovanovitch has as much to do with rudy giuliani. he was the elephant in the room and the gop kept staying away from him. there s this anticipation that rudy giuliani would be made scape egoat, which i think is really dangerous with everything he knows and how strong a force he can be. but he was the elephant in the room. well identified and thank you for your take on the first day of a historic process. the case against the president, all right. it s going to come down that evidence and the credibility of the witnesses. so even though this is a political process, we need our investigative big brains to tell us what they see, what the vulnerabilities are. what the strengths are to let us see where this goes. next. with fidelity wealth management you get straightforward advice,
which law enforcement loves to do. the greatest thing you could accomplish was to make sure the crime was not completed. that ser a wonderful thing to accomplish. you stopped the bad guys. but they still went to prison. but they don t get the death penalty. i don t think anyone is planning to hang the president of the united states. but removing him from office is a political death penalty. i think it was announced, you re going to hear that. sure but the core message that democrats have to convince the public and the senate is this president abused his foreign policy power for his own benefit. and the way they re going to do that on the republican side is to throw out anything they possibly can to distract from that message. so that s why you heard about this is all second hand.
down nowhere is it written that whistleblower can t do that. when you guys say they changed the rules, that s not true and the i. good. did what he s supposed to do. you guys complained fire sng. yeah, that s one of the reports that he doesn tb like how he handled the whistleblower. the reporting has turped out to be retie dang good. look where we are right now. no quid pro quo. there s been no crime committed and they re still trying to impeach the president because of why? you can t say either of those two things because you don t know have you heard any of it? yegs. the democrats are wrong to use the word extorgsz. this was an attempted bribe and not just because it s in the constitution. the president says to ukrain i know what you want, you want
wanting an investigation on biden. by the way the staffer for taylor is there friday. the big take away. you know the main defense for trump. nothing happened. ukrain got the aid, they never delivered on dirt. and this is about getting to the middle of the meddling. they pretended this is about whether ukrain and not russia was to blame. meaning they re once again trashing the findings of our intel agencies. can democrats get the president saying to someone that he basically wanted to bribe ukrain? today s bomb shell gets him closer. we ll see what sondland says. in court it s usually those directed by them who reveal the top s role. but to remove a president close shouldn t cut it. two, will we hear from anyone in
i know that republicans mounted two defenses. but you heard that from people. you didn t talk to the president. they re also not saying the facts are contested. nobody is saying the president didn t do this stuff. they re saying you re not in the room and the other interesting argument that you eluded to is event that he will aid was restored or but the president has the absolute power to dismiss an ambassador and i saw people scratching their heads but when you pull those arguments apart it takes ten seconds to explain that s a really shaby defense. one step back from the witnesses. are you curious lat how ambassador taylor didn t know about this phone call when he was originally deposed? as he told us today he only learned about it i guess last week. so when he was depose fwhied committee he apparently didn t can know about it. that s what he said but i