Oversight Committee Chairman james comers Sham Impeachment Inquiry of president joe biden, was not In Washington testifying on behalf of House Republicans, that maybe would have made sense. Do you know why . He was at a hearing of his own, in Federal Court in las vegas. Because alexander stern of, the same person whos supposed to be the star witness, is charged with fabricating claims about the president and his son hunter biden. In relation to a Ukrainian Energy company. And for that, he could face up to 25 years in prison. A judge did release him on under strict conditions, including gps monitoring, and somewhat fittingly based on his shadowy reputation, i think its fair to say, we dont even seem to know what this guy looks like. We cant even show you a picture of him. Today, also a new filing, just a few hours ago released from federal prosecutors, added a pretty shocking, yet somewhat kind of predictable twist to all of this i wonder if youre ready for this. Russian spies, again. A
Oversight Committee Chairman james comers Sham Impeachment Inquiry of president joe biden, was not In Washington testifying on behalf of House Republicans, that maybe would have made sense. Do you know why . He was at a hearing of his own, in Federal Court in las vegas. Because alexander stern of, the same person whos supposed to be the star witness, is charged with fabricating claims about the president and his son hunter biden. In relation to a Ukrainian Energy company. And for that, he could face up to 25 years in prison. A judge did release him on under strict conditions, including gps monitoring, and somewhat fittingly based on his shadowy reputation, i think its fair to say, we dont even seem to know what this guy looks like. We cant even show you a picture of him. Today, also a new filing, just a few hours ago released from federal prosecutors, added a pretty shocking, yet somewhat kind of predictable twist to all of this i wonder if youre ready for this. Russian spies, again. A
Oversight Committee Chairman james comers Sham Impeachment Inquiry of president joe biden, was not In Washington testifying on behalf of House Republicans, that maybe would have made sense. Do you know why . He was at a hearing of his own, in Federal Court in las vegas. Because alexander stern of, the same person whos supposed to be the star witness, is charged with fabricating claims about the president and his son hunter biden. In relation to a Ukrainian Energy company. And for that, he could face up to 25 years in prison. A judge did release him on under strict conditions, including gps monitoring, and somewhat fittingly based on his shadowy reputation, i think its fair to say, we dont even seem to know what this guy looks like. We cant even show you a picture of him. Today, also a new filing, just a few hours ago released from federal prosecutors, added a pretty shocking, yet somewhat kind of predictable twist to all of this i wonder if youre ready for this. Russian spies, again. A
There were no bullhorns nor speeches. It was just food, music and camaraderie. Organizers say the goal of this protest is very focused. Protesters want stanford to first disclose its investments related to any corporations profiting from the conflict in gaza, and then to divest. The ceasefire call is definitely a part of it, right . But like, i think we understand that within our very local context of being Stanford University students, we can probably leverage the most effort towards making a cease fire happen by like building on this huge pile of pressure, right, of which divestment and that kind of Company Pressure is a very clear part of that picture. On friday, stanford released this statement. While stanford understands students perspectives on an important global issue, violations of University Policy will not be overlooked. The submission of student names to the office of Community Standards student conduct process has begun in the University Also sent a message to the full com
Suggested that he was not aware that the post office was able to prosecute subpostmasters, individuals that work for the organisation. That was the most striking moment because he was Managing Directorfor several years. Because he was Managing Directorfor severalyears. During because he was Managing Directorfor several years. During that time, there were hundreds of prosecutions against Sub Postmasters and after establishing at the beginning of his testimony how important that was, that he was running the business, he then said that he just didnt even know that these prosecutions were being brought forward by the post office, that there was no independent body, no review as to whether those decisions made sense and he realises that two thirds of those cases, those decisions, were being taken by the post office owe you wonder that how is it when youve seen these documents that are going to him, talking about these criminal cases, that he didnt understand as the man in the top job that t