Page 3 - Techs Inc News Today

When it comes to the federal securities laws, clear answers can occasionally be hard to find. There may be no better example than the question around the overlap of the "misstatement liability"...

When it comes to the federal securities laws, clear answers can occasionally be hard to find. There may be no better example than the question around the overlap of the "misstatement...

The Department of Defense (“DoD”) recently issued its final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”) to provide offerors enhanced post-award...

According to the final rule, the enhanced debriefing requirements serve multiple purposes.

On March 15, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) introduced a new Motion to Amend (MTA) Pilot Program. The Pilot Program gave patent owners an option to (1)...

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently reversed an appeal of a decision granting summary judgment that an invention was reduced to practice during the term of a...

I Introduction M&A litigation in the United States continued to see similar trends over the last year. The Delaware courts continued to refine…

In Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.,1 a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that investors who purchase stock in a direct listing—in which pre-existing shares are sold to the public without underwriters.

On September 20, 2021, in Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc., a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that investors who purchase stock in a “direct...

Panel: Judges Prost, Clevenger, and Dyk, with Judge Dyk writing the opinion You should read this case if: you have a prior art patent that was cancelled in inter partes review  In our case of the week, a patent challenger challenged patent claims as obvious in light of a prior patent. But that prior patent was itself cancelled in an inter partes review. Does that patent remain prior art for purposes of the obviousness analysis?  Baxter, the patent owner in this case, argued “no.” In Baxte...