shannon, this was fascinating. we saw the court in almost total unison on wondering how far colorado was going and why. spell it out. yeah, normally you know, neil, it takes years to get here, maybe months if you re fast tracking. this made it in weeks. showing the urgency the court gets about this happening in an election year. so they d had the arguments. there were tough questions for both sides. at the end of the day, it really came down to whether or not this 14th amendment provision applies to president trump. justice thomas had questions about it. when this was passed in the late 1860s, why don t you look at examples from that time period showing this was meant for states to be allowed to kick people off of federal ballots. here s part of that exchange. the concern is that the former confederate states would continue being bad actors. the effort was to prevent them from doing this. you re saying while this also authorizes state to disqualify candidates. so what i m
bet blowing up. the bipartisan border security bill now doubtful in the senate and dead on arrive value in the house. bet 2, the push to impeach homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas, a vote still on but all bets off as a second republican says he s a no. why california congressman tom mcclintock calls it a stunt and wants to explain here. bet three, that sure immunity defense from donald trump and his legal team, that a former president is shielded from prosecution. not so, not justified and to hear a unanimous appeals court today rule so not happening. so what now? well, place your bets. your world starts now. all right. so many bets, so little time. let s get right to it. welcome. i m neil cavuto. to chad pergram who always reminds me it s about the math, it s about the math. the numbers here is close as you can get, hu, chad? really tight, neil. impeachment for mayorkas will hinge on the math. two house republicans are expected to vote no. ken buck of colorad