Yes. Im offended. But i cannot do anything. Reporter father says theres a lack of priests. The new practice will promote priesthood and he says some people have left but he thinks this decision will actually bring in more parishioners. We have seen an overall increase in numbers i must say and the income is up in the church. If thats their argument its shallow. Reporter some say discriminatory. I feel kind of, um, insulted just because it shouldnt matter what youre like. Reporter i asked father joseph if this new practice will set the church back about 20, 30 years. He says, no. He says given how low the attendance is here, he says theres only one direction and thats going up. Live in the Richmond District in San Francisco, im da lin, kpix 5. Father joseph says he did get permission from the San Francisco archbishop to train only boys to be altar boys. We made some calls and so far it policy only applies to the star of the sea church. Other catholic parishes are not affected. Its not o
To identify common themes that arose that includes the need to create more spaces for kids and also to create a clean lawn area for people for both recessions. And in terms of an you opportunity the tennis court was preserved as a part that was not highly used and it would be used for Something Else for the community for the park and also tennis is typically used by two to four players so considering the says that a quarter of the park it was perceived that perhaps the space could be better utilized to provide for recreation opportunities for more people. We then took the comments and created optional schemes for public feedback. And also for voting. The scheme that received the most support is option number 3 in this scheme the tennis court is removed on that plan in order to create an additional lawn area. That scheme shows a people only area that we had heard from the First Community meeting for people use. Running a close second at the meeting was option 2 which also removed the te
For Something Else for the community for the park and also tennis is typically used by two to four players so considering the says that a quarter of the park it was perceived that perhaps the space could be better utilized to provide for recreation opportunities for more people. We then took the comments and created optional schemes for public feedback. And also for voting. The scheme that received the most support is option number 3 in this scheme the tennis court is removed on that plan in order to create an additional lawn area. That scheme shows a people only area that we had heard from the First Community meeting for people use. Running a close second at the meeting was option 2 which also removed the tennis court and created a lawn space but the appeal of that particular plan was the adjacentcy of the people on the lawn with the playground that they were right next to each other. And we have a third scheme which is essentially the it is Basketball Court and the playground and so
For Something Else for the community for the park and also tennis is typically used by two to four players so considering the says that a quarter of the park it was perceived that perhaps the space could be better utilized to provide for recreation opportunities for more people. We then took the comments and created optional schemes for public feedback. And also for voting. The scheme that received the most support is option number 3 in this scheme the tennis court is removed on that plan in order to create an additional lawn area. That scheme shows a people only area that we had heard from the First Community meeting for people use. Running a close second at the meeting was option 2 which also removed the tennis court and created a lawn space but the appeal of that particular plan was the adjacentcy of the people on the lawn with the playground that they were right next to each other. And we have a third scheme which is essentially the it is Basketball Court and the playground and so
For Something Else for the community for the park and also tennis is typically used by two to four players so considering the says that a quarter of the park it was perceived that perhaps the space could be better utilized to provide for recreation opportunities for more people. We then took the comments and created optional schemes for public feedback. And also for voting. The scheme that received the most support is option number 3 in this scheme the tennis court is removed on that plan in order to create an additional lawn area. That scheme shows a people only area that we had heard from the First Community meeting for people use. Running a close second at the meeting was option 2 which also removed the tennis court and created a lawn space but the appeal of that particular plan was the adjacentcy of the people on the lawn with the playground that they were right next to each other. And we have a third scheme which is essentially the it is Basketball Court and the playground and so