lot of pressure taking over from his dad. i m not sure it is a response to what he said but in a broader sense, the u.s. has ratcheted up pressure across the board and talked about the fact that we re not going to allow the north koreas to keep going. so now the question is what is the u.s. going to do? we don t know a lot about this test yet. it is not an underground nuclear test. it is probably a continuation of the testing program they ve had. i think what we re going to see is a flurry of activity of the u.s. going back to the chinese and they ll be working with the south koreans and the japanese. i m not sure that we would be in a position to retaliate in any way, shape or form beyond what secretary tillerson said today other than putting the screws to them on the economic side. well, do you think very quickly, south korea and japan, will they have an ask on this?
be that version. in fact, there s no clear consensus yet on what kind of missile they ve used, but they have a version they ve used in submarine launches. clearly solid fuel would be a break through for north korea they ve been working on in the last year. it s important to understand in 2016 they had 25 missile launches in that year alone. they re working on this new generation of missiles, but i think today s firing of a missile was more in a sort of context of this ceremony and i think it s a huge embarrassment to the north koreans. if that s a huge embarrassment might you expect then for a nuclear test to be ensuing? you know, depending on where they are on that, but, yes, i would think they would follow up an embarrassment with something that would be successful, but it s hard to know where they stand on their testing program. they may have wanted to have a nuclear test, but didn t feel
north korea s ability to he could set off a madman with a tweet like this. north korea. north korea performed fourth nuclear test they are getting better. christopher hill former ambassador, also with us barbara demic la times she author of nothing to envy. how alarm should we be that they are going to test an icbm? they are testing program continued preach unapated. it s going on for years. they are testing our politician as they are testing military
it saves. just one day before that, similar worries in the kansas city star , where missouri this past year was the most recent state to install drug testing for welfare recipients and where neighboring kansas is scheduled to be next. the program s price in missouri described as, quote, astronomical by one state s legislature, quote, a horrible waste of state resources. costs in missouri include $170,000 just for staffing administrative hearings for the people who are getting denied benefits. in kansas, they ve already earmarked nearly $1 million to pay for this policy, including $600,000 for upgrading computers to get ready for the testing program. really? you think you re going to save money with that much money invested? on new year s eve, a federal appeals court in florida ruled again on the policy that started this new trend in the red states. remember, the florida policy was originally stopped by the courts just a few months after it was implemented in 2011. but on new year s ev
neighboring kansas is scheduled to be next. the program s price in missouri described as, quote, astronomical by one state s legislature, quote, a horrible waste of state resources. costs in missouri include $170,000 just for staffing administrative hearings for the people who are getting denied benefits. in kansas, they ve already earmarked nearly $1 million to pay for this policy, including $600,000 for upgrading computers to get ready for the testing program. really? you think you re going to save money with that much money invested? on new year s eve, a federal appeals court in florida ruled again on the policy that started this new trend in the red states. remember, the florida policy was originally stopped by the courts just a few months after it was implemented in 2011. but on new year s eve, on tuesday night, the appeals court affirmed that ruling and shut the program down. saying, in no uncertain terms, quote, there is no set of circumstances under which the warrantless, suspi