to happen, we use it every day. we are really hopeful this is a transition issue like you re saying and that the president president trump ran on a campaign on a law & order campaign.re without this database, the people breaking the law and being censured for animal cruelty and violate things the animal welfare act are now hidden and unaccountable. we re really hoping the president will call somebody on the usda and put this back online. tucker: that s exactly why i wanted to have you on, so manyom things happen and things fall through the cracks you never know what s going on. this is one specific case where you could say this is not serving the public at all. c to the testing question, i think like a lot of people i m on the tragic necessity side. it horrifies me that it happens, if it s between a child and a dog, you d probably go with a child, of course he would. i fear is a a longtime washington resident that funding drives some of this experimentation beyond the point that is
my testing question. i want to respond to that. basically, what we re talking about is it s not the case that all school districts know who the grossly ineffective teachers are, at least in california, because you only have 16 months under that statute to try to make a decision about whether or not somebody can achieve learning gains. that s highly problematic. as the court found, it basically results in a quality-blind determination that by default, has grossly ineffective teachers in classrooms and disparately in black and brown and low income communities. i m just asking, i just really want to ask, is the empirical measure of effectiveness, i need you to clarify this for me, whether it happens at 16 or 18 months or four years or ten years, is the measure student test scores? the measure is a combination of factors and it s important that it be objective evidence of learning, which can include student surveys, obviously standardized test scores because they re required to be ad