paul: welcome to the journal editorial report. i m paul gigot. we given this week with begin this weeking with a supreme court showdown. the justices set to hear oral arguments on thursday in a case that could upsend the 2024 presidential race as they consider whether donald trump can be removed from the my mare primary ballot in colorado. that state s court ruled the president president is ingel under section three of the 14th amendment which prohibits an officer of the united states who took an oath to support the constitution and then engaged in insurrection from holding office again. let s bring in former attorney general of the united states michael mukasey is. judge, welcome back to the show. good to have you here. you ve written, for us in fact, hat president of the united states is not covered by the disqualification claus. why not? right. first of all, the presidency is not an office a under the united states. s it is, it has an independent source of power. i
activist. a good textualist judge who understands and applies the constitution, understands and applies the law. harris: your perspective as a layperson, you say you report an attorney, these are the questions you might think americans are asking themselves, too, how you go ahead. you don t know how some one will vote until they vote. i want to give you the last word. well, i think that if you look at, these are lifetime appointments. these are highly independent people. they get nominated by the president, they get confirmed by the senate, but history has proven that the great justices really deliver on that independent evens. they deliver on really their role in the article 3 branch, their independence. not to be the administration, not to be congress, it s to judge our actions. harris: senate judiciary committee about to ask the questions, we think there will be a month-long process and maybe get into play ahead of the mid-term elections in october. these conversations that we