Page 3 - Thatjoin Facebook News Today

Routinely try to reduce the discussion to things like you can either have transparency or privacy, which do you want to have? for if you want safety you have to have censorship. in reality they have lots of content —based choices that would sliver off half a percentage point of growth, and facebook is unwilling to give up those slivers for our safety. unwilling to give up those slivers for oursafety. i unwilling to give up those slivers for our safety. i came forward now because now is the mos...

Limits it. the thing we need to think about is where do we add selective friction to these systems so that they are safe in every language, you dont need the ais so that they are safe in every language, you dont need the ms to find the content? in language, you dont need the ais to find the content?— language, you dont need the ais to find the content? in your experience is facebook — find the content? in your experience is facebook testing _ find the content? in your experience is facebook ...

Needs to address, making sure the equality act and the intention of that act, to protect people from discrimination, is also followed through as it relates to the online safety bill. at the moment we think there are opportunities available to be enhancements, as it relates to the online safety bill, for there to be mechanisms put in place to create production across users, but we have seen from the example you just shared that right now in office not being done and we have to call on social medi...

Impact _ experience. we talk a lot about the impact of— experience. we talk a lot about the impact of algorithmic based recommendation towards news feed. to what extent _ recommendation towards news feed. to what extent do you think groups are shaping _ what extent do you think groups are shaping the experience for many people _ shaping the experience for many people on— shaping the experience for many people on facebook?— shaping the experience for many people on facebook? those by a huge...

Dangerous, that if people are lulled into a sense of safety, that no one will either hate speech or no one will either hate speech or no one will see more sensitive things like maybe they havent come out yet. that is dangerous because those spaces are not safe. when 100,000 people see something you dont know who saw it and what they might do, i am a big proponent of both google and twitter are radically more transparent and facebook, people every day download search results on google and analyse...

Have a fire hose just twitter because if we want to catch national security threats like intervention operations we need to have notjust the people on facebook looking at it we need 10,000 researchers get it and i think in addition to that we would have a credibility on things like algorithmic bias or understanding whether or not our children are safe. just understanding whether or not our children are safe.— children are safe. just on twitter and algorithmic— children are safe. just on twit...

Joining us remotely, jim knight. - joining us remotely, jim knight. thank— joining us remotely, jim knight. thank you — joining us remotely, jim knight. thank you for talking to us. first of all— thank you for talking to us. first of alljust— thank you for talking to us. first of alljust some _ thank you for talking to us. first of alljust some of _ thank you for talking to us. first of alljust some of the _ thank you for talking to us. first of alljust some of the last - of alljust some...

She is the former facebook insider who revealed its most closely—guarded secrets. ia—year—old molly russell... he is the father who lost his daughter to suicide. now campaigning to protect other children online. nice to meet you. so lovely to meet you. here, meeting for the first time. so what do you think the impact of mollys story was on instagram as a platform and how it approaches safety? facebook is full of kind, conscientious, well—meaning people. the real question is around can we...

Employees were saying you could do this, you _ employees were saying you could do this, you could do that, i think a lot of— this, you could do that, i think a lot of people dont understand what you could _ lot of people dont understand what you could do, so i would really love you could do, so i would really love you to _ you could do, so i would really love you to say — you could do, so i would really love you to say to — you could do, so i would really love you to say to the committee, ...

People like them and share them and do other things to interact. an ad that gets more engagement is cheaper. we have seen that over and over again in the facebook research it is easier to provoke people with anger than compassion or empathy and so we are literally subsidising hate on these platforms. it is cheaper, substantially, to run and angry head full divisive ad that it is to run a compassionate and empathetic dad and i think there is a need for things even disclosing what rates people are...