the supreme court s six three decision striking down the use of racial preferences in college admissions. biden was sentpreferen out by wr winds him up to lie. aff affirmative action is so s misunderstood. many people wrongly believe that affirmative action allows unequal white students, unqualified students to be admitted ahead of qualifie d. this is not this is not how college admissions work. now, the white house comms people aren t that ignorant.w th they know the truth that the entire point of preferences is to give minority candidates an edg me, regardless ofheir their test scores or the transcripts, or resume trani it s classic discrimination and it s based on race. colleges set out standards for admission and every student, every student has to meet those standards. meeand only that after firstmen meeting, the qualifications required by the school to college forget other factors. in additio other factorsn to thh such as race. okaasy what s less believablb that h
he later elaborated on this on msnbcpejorati. he said, this court is not normal. what you mean? what i meant by that is just one more to unravel. basic and basic decisions inha any court rulings. every history.t and that s what i meant by not normal devin. when a case has been decided in an unconstitutional manner, un held thatutional manner, precedent does not stand that it would make no sense. tha and we ve seen that. and time and again in the left has been d happy when precedent has been overturned, but not in this casbut e. , actu yeah, no, actually, one of the things i think is really interestini thg in these cases e i really haven t heard much talk about today tal is that the court had the opportunity to overturn on the harvard and you and see admissions processec s title six, which ise civil rights law and that veryy says that schools that receive federal funding cannot in