matters close to an election because it could impact an election. that doesn't mean an investigation has to stop. here it's already overt. the cat's out of the bag. >> a trial feels pretty overt. >> it is overt. the case itself is already overt. >> you think they would pull the guy off the campaign trail. >> i don't think so. that's probably not the case. if the trial has started, i don't think they're going to stop the trial. the judge would have something to say about that. so i think it's -- again, we're in uncharted waters here. >> so unchartsed. you're all i've got. i don't know -- >> it is fun to think about. and i think that they're going to be some interesting motions that we haven't seen. not just venue motions and things of that nature, but you know, the impact on whether he can get a fair jury pool when we're talking about maybe a presidential candidate against another presidential candidate, the department of justice. that's never been done before. >> ed, thank you so much for joining us. and thank you to the control room for indulging all my
am going to give it a shot. i am going to give it a shot. i don't know, i'm nice to chatgpt that is my strategy. i'm polite. excuse me chatgpt, if you wouldn't mind. >> greg: have you been using it? >> yeah, it's so great. >> i use grammarly, it gets on my nerves. misspelled, a couple comments, i go back up, how about if we rearrange the sentence, i gotta get this done tonight. please, grammarly, i hate you. i like it when my work was illiterate. i'm afraid to go beyond any step beyond grammarly. >> greg: it feels like this is already a fore gone conclusion and we are going to deal with it now that it's out there, what is the old phrase? the cat's out of the pandora's box? that's it, thank you. >> i don't think we should
the agency and investigative team raises serious concerns given that the investigation was the subject of the agent's protected whistle-blower disclosure. the committee will not tell rate the department's retaliatory conduct against this or any other whistle-blower. now, let's go back to shapley and his history. he joined the hunter biden tax team in 2020. formally blew the whistle, he declined to cite mal i have sense, citing that he is still an employee. look where that got him. the cat's out of the bag. what difference if you spill the beans, all the beans, some of the beans, spill them all. what does he have to lose at this point? >> it is against the law to spill to the media but not a law to share with congress. that's what he is doing behind closed doors. we just got the durham report. if you read that report, it shows that the doj went full throttle against
justice. each time it always benefited the subject be. >> why do you want to navigate these waters? >> i don't want to do any of this. i took an oath of office and when i saw egregiousness of some of these things, it no longer became a choice for me. it's not something that i want to do. it's something it that i feel i have to do. >> none of this should surprise any of us. biden's justice department and fbi have been running cover for him since day one. and we have multiple whistleblowers who agree. one whistleblower alleges that the fbi has been sitting on evidence proving joe biden was directly involved in a bribery scheme. and they have had it since the summer of 2020 just before the 2020 election. so that's at least two huge things. the laptop and the bribes. that the fbi has purposefully concealed from voters who deserve to know everything before casting a ballot. but now the cat's out of the bag and the fbi still won't release that evidence. >> our specific request, first
all social media sites. there are many applications many using in this country that they have no idea how their privacy is being tracked every single day, the kind of data that is being stored in them that is not only targeting marketers telling people about who you are aware you are what your income is. what your health she was on and can be used in so many different ways from young people when they go to get a job. the older people in terms of insurance needs medicine. the kinds of these are unfortunately, the cat's out of the bag in many ways, but we need to pay attention to privacy issues period, that kind of data people are storing on us. and also our young people have no idea of knowing what is truth and not truth, and we need to teach them somehow that their minds are having things to help them think a certain way and that's a danger to them, too. congresswoman debbie dingell.
it is definitely plausible, beryl howell, at least according to to reports, turned over some of the information immediately to the department of justice. that's unusual that a district court would take what they have, the ex parte to review, obviously the cat's out of the bag at that point, and so this does sort of protect in many ways the government because, you now have this circuit saying, yes, what the district court did was fine. i have to say, the judge has ruled in this exact issue during the special counsel mueller investigation. there's a public decision that she's written on. it is so solid and so strong that i think she must have been feeling very confident that there's just no argument here that this is either attorney/client privilege, and even if it is, it's a crime fraud exception applies, there's a simple roll, which you cannot
ivanka and son-in-law jared kushner are also being subpoenaed this week by the special counsel investigating january 6th. you know, trump did not try to stop them from testifying before the house commercispecial commi. do you expect trump to claim executive privilege in any way, shape or form as it concerns these new subpoenas? >> very difficult to do. the cat's out of the bag, so to sp speak. when you disclose something, it's hard to say later on that it's privilege d. i think the real fight is going to be over the testimony of vice president mike pence, and that's still ongoing. >> thank you so much. a new study shows insomnia may be linked to a higher risk of having a heart attack. the magic number of hours of
on behind closed doors in the da's office. and i don't know what evidence is being presented, i don't know whether charges will be brought. but as it relates to the hush money circumstances, those facts have been known, literally four years, michael cohen wrote about them in his book. he testified about them, stormy daniels wrote a book, stormy daniels appeared on michael cohen's podcast to talk about it. and the federal prosecutors brought their own prosecution based on those facts. i'm not letting the cat's out of the, bag if you would, those cats have been running all over the place, really literally four years. >> but the reasoning about whether not to bring charges, based on those facts? is that helpful to any defense counsel? >> i don't think, so the legal issue that i've noted in the book, is an issue that appears on the face of the statute, it's already been written about, it was written about before my book has come out. on the financial statements
just because he gives him truth social the next day, i didn't say that, the voters obviously, showed you in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2022, that they're not as dumb as you and other republicans think they are. in speaking of dumb, speaking of dumb, adrienne, a certain former auburn football coach who's now a republican senator said, well, the cat's out of the bag in early voting. i guess we got to figure that out. adrienne, i don't know, and see, here's the thing, okay. i'm such a patient man, but the stuff i have been saying about donald trump being bad for republicans, i have been saying for six years. i've been telling republicans for six years. i've been talking about this early vote thing forever.
because they were in providently given access to them -- but putting that aside -- and again, i haven't seen anything like that, peter. the horse is out of the barn, the cat's out of the bag. whatever cliche you want to use. those texts are going to be in the hands of investigators for the committee and for the department of justice very soon. >> you can see why that was a problem in the eyes of the defendant there, as we watched alex jones literally just sitting there, and his eyes got wide when he figured out that happened. i want to play for you some new comments by liz cheney about the doj and the former prosecution of donald trump and then i'll get your thoughts. take a listen. >> i have been very clear. i think he's guilty of the most serious dereliction of duty of any president in our nation's history. we're going to continue to follow the facts. i think the department of justice will do that, but they have to make decisions about prosecution understanding what it means if the facts and the