him. so if you watched garland carefully, his press conference the other day, you may have noticed that he appeared highly annoyed by the idea of having to stoop to explain himself to mere citizens. he found a solution. being a liberal, merrick garland s first instinct was to seize the role of victim, because when you re a victim you ve already won the argument. you don t have to explain yourself. you don t have to change your behavior. you re by definition the good guy. the victim always is. being oppressed means never having to say you re sorry. so as garland explained in the press conference, the fbi was the victim. mean old fox news was asking unfair questions, and that s wrong. the real problem isn t that america s most powerful law enforcement agency is corrupt, no, the real problem is the people have dared to complain about it, and they must stop immediately or else they re domestic terrorists. as gary put it with genuine outrage, i will not silently stand by as the in
extinction. wired magazine wouldn t have their back on that, but through? what is this? it s important to do an overview of the last white man. basically a character suffers through an apockko lips. a book like this, somewhere between racial permationist literature could only be written about one group. that privilege is reserved for whites. there s a whole industry for this stuff, tucker. there are no shortage of eager consumers who eat this stuff up, because they believe, truly, that there s no limit to the amount of demeaning that we can inflict on whites. and again, it goes beyond bad
sudden out of nowhere it is acceptable in the media to engage in overt race hatred. here s the most latest example. journalists are celebrating a book called the last white man. it s a fictional account, but effectively it celebrates the elimination of an entire race, which used to be called genocide, and we re against that, but not anymore. the author of the book said it would be, quote, the beginning of something great if an entire race disappears. wired magazine agrees, calling the book a glimpse of a future without white people. of course they re batting that. when did we get behind the idea of genocide being a good thing? they re saying it out loud. what should we say? pedro this seems like a sea change. you didn t used to be allowed to say i hate an entire race of people and hope that their