which i must say did a great job on me. gave me a new aortic valve. and there you ve touched on a crucial point. these usufruks destroy the bond of social solidarity, you cannot endlessly profit from a subsidized system and spend the time worrying about obligations to people in the same situation. you can spend a lot of time talking about obligations but worrying about them, quite different. mark: you said i m doing well, this guy may not be. i have no complaints. isn t that the point, when you are unmoored from these principles, unmoored from values, belief systems or faith, where everyone believes they come from. that s what it comes down to. i got what i want. he didn t get it, that s his problem. aren t societies developing more and more in that
hypothesis. all men are not created equal. quite a difference in the biological world, if you want a comparison, look to our nearest neighbors, you would never say all chimpanzees are brothers endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights. why should we say that? but we do? we tolerate the inconsistency because we re forced to. mark: we tolerate the inconsistency, but when it comes to actual governance, the inconsistency in many ways isn t even tolerated. what i mean by that is it s a point of propaganda. it s a point of emotion, but there are parties, there are efforts, right, that adopt this
it has its ups and downs and it s clearly on the point of radical dissolution, right now. what s going to replace it? whether it will evoke the same clamorous contingent of supporters that darwinism has evoked? i don t know. we ll see. a lot of sinister developments happening. big data is itself a response of a kind to the absence of theory and biology and psychology. mark: big data, the collection of health records, social tons and tons of data, together with artificial intelligence protect the data. if you don t understand what s going on, psychology, and if you don t understand what s going on in biology, heap together a ton of data and start looking at it. that s a response. that s something different. that was not expected. mark: uh-huh. i think a lot of our viewers hearing what you ve talked about in atheism, darwinism and
flatly inconsistent darwinian hypothesis. all men are not created equal. quite a difference in the biological world, if you want a comparison, look to our nearest neighbors, you would never say all chimpanzees are brothers endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights. why should we say that? but we do? we tolerate the inconsistency because we re forced to. mark: we tolerate the inconsistency, but when it comes to actual governance, the inconsistency in many ways isn t even tolerated. what i mean by that is it s a point of propaganda. it s a point of emotion, but there are parties, there are efforts, right, that adopt this
job on me. gave me a new aortic valve. and there you ve touched on a crucial point. these usufruks destroy the bond of social solidarity, you cannot endlessly profit from a subsidized system and spend the time worrying about obligations to people in the same situation. you can spend a lot of time talking about obligations but worrying about them, quite different. mark: you said i m doing well, this guy may not be. i have no complaints. isn t that the point, when you are unmoored from these principles, unmoored from values, belief systems or faith, where everyone believes they come from. that s what it comes down to. i got what i want. he didn t get it, that s his problem. aren t societies developing more and more in that