Page 71 - The Process News Today

A new tell all book on the trump he couldnt move through the world, do whatever he wanted whenever he wanted to. presidency is set to be published next month. >> right. so the point that those who were the author is the mysterious lynched were exactly the opposite. >> exactly the opposite. writer behind the anonymous op-ed that was published in 2018 >> went through life without -- >> with fear. >> with fear. titled "i am part of the without power. and then when apprehended for resistance inside ...

Probes against president trump. but house republicans are readying plans to fight back to join me now, congressman steve police, house minority whip. congress been devin nunes, ranking member, all of your grades to see you tonight. congressman unions, what does this to tell us tonight about the state of things. >> she still has the problem she does not have the power unless she and peaches but what shes trying to do is to short-circuit the process. i dont think shell have the formal process and ...

Would she go back? should she go back to nadler? would he be, should he be the point person? >> not mr. nava, not maxine watch waters waters, not elijah cummings. she would be better served in my opinion to put together a special committee where you take people who arent chairman, arent tainted by the process. this process has been ugly in their people and i dont think they would want to do this necessarily but i think they are fair-minded. this really gets resolved in some ways if she takes thi...

>> reporter: on the senate side, the judiciary chairman lindsey graham, close trump ally, invited rudy giuliani to testify about all of this and giuliani saying he may well do that. there is bipartisan support on capitol hill for that, brooke. democrats want giuliani under oath as well. brooke? >> bipartisan support. how about that? manu raju. thanks. my panel is back. and carrie, back to you. how much weight does this subpoena hold without an official house vote? do they need to hold a vote? >>...

Term, big picture, if this is bipartisan. if there is a select committee. if it has a wait, a gravitas to it. no question, the republicans are watching the polls, and well talk about that. >> in a second. >> if some of them decide they are ready to vote for impeachment in the house or for removal if it gets to the senate, the more serious the process is. the less of a circus, the more it helps them. >> lets get to the polls, frank rooney. heres the deal today from "washington post," george mason...

And seung lin. adam schiff met with the whistle-blower prior, thats not true. he didnt meet with him. the whistle-blower reached out to the office and was guided the complaint via the process. what is the law here? is the state department, is the white house breaking the law by not letting him testify? >> as i understand it, this was a voluntary request. sondland agreed to appear voluntarily. so far they arent breaking the law or anything because theres no actual subpoena thats been issued. if t...

Between the legal team and congress until nearly a month after the whistle-blower complaint was submitted. i can unequivocally state that neither any member of the legal team nor the whistle-blower has ever met or spoken with congressman schiff about this matter. what we find out from "the new york times" is a staffer of schiff acted as the intermediary. why would this need to go to schiff via a staffer before it became a matter of public record? why? >> i think adam schiff needs to tell us what...

The process started to be politicized. we need to all back the process down, use stop using it for political purposes and use it for what it is designed for, get evidence of wrongdoing so special counsel and prosecutors can all do their jobs. >> dan, count me among those who hadnt seen a whistle-blower account like this before. what does it tell you about the way this individual approached the complaint. what did you make of how it was presented? >> as a very well-written document the the first ...

Kept saying. that his team brought the attention of the doj and it will see. for better or worse. his immediate triage was for executive privilege. this is a man of process. perhaps he was held captive by the process. perhaps its to his detriment, but it seemed like he was this product of these decades of military service where his first inclination is to go through a bureaucratic process. subject of the complaint. >> harris: the term campaign issued a statement on the house until committee hear...

If it werent for the fact youre moving to remove chairman nadler because youre so frustrated by the process. what is the legal base -- you dont need one, this is politics. actually think you should get rid of him? >> oddly enough, were not just making this stuff up. the house rules say that the house determines whether or not there is an impeachment inquiry. we have to actually vote on that. whats been happening since july when chairman nadler just went forward for this investigation was, he was...