themselves. what is required is indicting low-level political figures and working your way up, applying pressure so that you can build a bridge up to trump and company and you can t do that by just prosecuting the boots of the insurrection. you can t build a bridge to donald trump and the ruling class and political criminals by exploiting the boots of the insurrection. there s no connective tissue there. i am with claire, i heard her rant many times and i can t understand why lower level political people have not been indicted over the course of the past two years so that we can build that bridge up to the signature, you know, bigger criminal fish. so why are we here now? i don t know. i m glad that jack smith was appointed back in november because he has been moving out quickly and aggressively. i only wish that the department of justice had been doing that for the prior year and a half. and i think it s another
knows that well, which is why he doesn t seem worried at all criticizing the ruling class. that s what they indict you for. iticizing the rulingbut either s former job as ths e united stats here is not really the point here. yes, of course, you can indict former presidents if they ve donect for something wr. that s not what this is about.t. the headline here is that therer is , as noted, a presidential race in progressesin right now.e and if you check the polls, you will find that trump is leading the republican field. that s the unprecedent thing taking out your opponent, using. the justice system. if the democratic party is allowed to do this, allowed to crushd the presidential frontrunner, the main threat to their power with a boguwith s criminal case. where does that leave us ? we re done because that precedent will live forever and voters will nevel r again determine the outcome of a presidential election. kable wh it s remarkable when yu think about it. so after all, the yell
toxic materials that were dumped in east palestine. and during the trump administration, the white house rolled back those safety rules. just last year, rail workers across the country threatened to strike, in part, over safety conditions. but rail company successfully lobbied congress to squash that strike threat without addressing worker safety concerns, even as rail companies lined shareholder pockets with more than ten billion dollars in stock buybacks. the residents of east palestine are feeling the result of a decades long battle between corporate powers and a democratically elected governments. one of the elected officials who has spent his career focused on that very struggle is vermont senator bernie sanders. this week, he is out with a new book. it s okay to be angry about capitalism, in which senator sanders details the struggle against corporate influence in government in both major political parties and outlines his vision to fix it. he writes, the ruling class get their l
conditions. but rail company successfully lobbied congress to squash that strike threat without addressing worker safety concerns, even as rail companies lined shareholder pockets with more than ten billion dollars in stock buybacks. the residents of east palestine are feeling the result of a decades long battle between corporate powers and it democratically elected governments. one of the elected officials who has spent his career focused on that very struggle is vermont senator bernie sanders. this week, he is out with a new book. it s okay to be angry about capitalism, in which senator bernie sanders details the struggle against corporate influence in government in both major political parties and outlines his vision to fix it. he writes, the ruling class get their lobbyists to work on assuring that, when policies and regulations are written, congress and the state legislatures will agree to those that consolidate their advantages. by the time the average american catches on, the ru
do you reckon your own background has sort of prepared you for where you are right now? you know, you were brought up in a working class part of london, your family were working class and proud of it, and you were a union activist who suffered for your activities you were actually blacklisted at one point and got compensation for it. so, you ve been a fighter throughout your life. do you think this is why you are so ready to fight today? well, working class people have always had to fight. 0ur welfare state and our nhs, unemployment benefit, sickness benefit, were not given to us as gifts by the rich, by the ruling class, if you want to put it that way. we had to fight for them, from the time of the chartists. we had to fight for universal suffrage, we had to fight to get mps paid in the house of commons so working class people could go there. everything that we ve gained whether it s a collective agreement in a company or the nature of the welfare state has had to be fought for