wow. they didn t tell the court any of this? they did until the court where the money came from? they didn t tell the court they also knew that steele hated trump? because steele mentioned it to bruce orr. we go to that in a minute. there is substantial evidence suggesting that mr. steele material he the fbi, one which bears on his credibility. it starts, yet the fisa applications nor the existence of a news article dated september 23rd, 2016, which in particular contains some of the same dossier information aboutmp mr. page compiled by mr. steel on which the fbi relied in its application. not exquisitely stated, this is presumably, the article written by michael is a cough, yahoo! news, titled u.s. intel officials broke ties between u.d kremlin. it attempts a to explain away e
year, and then using that information in the dossier sean: what about comey s flimsy excuse? he had given us good information in the past? before the fbi, sebastien, goes before a fisa court, applying to spy on an opposition candidate, they downplay who paid for it? they purposely hide that from a court but don t they have some obligation to see if it s true at all, beyond, we like this guy, we worked with him in the past? they have an obligation to verify that the information in the application for the warrant is legal. mark lavergne said at right. with this document, it is proven that hillary clinton bought a warrant to spy on and sean: stay on that thought. we ll pick it up. the panel stays with us and much more. wait until you see this tape of congressman adam schiff, straight ahead. touch is how we communicate with those we love, but when your psoriasis is bad,
top-secret, spy on american citizens. on this case, presidential candidate, but all theom information is coming from your opponent, why bother to tell the judge that part freights because they were so many chances for the fbi and department of justice to doo the right thing and at every turn, time after time, they did the wrong thing. sean: who is in legal jeopardy tonight, gregg jarrett? anybody who signed off on this fisa warrant under penalty of perjury. anybody represented themselves as an officer of the court and committed a fraud on the court. when they first learned all of this came from the russians, experts on lies and deception, they should have said, mr. steele, goodbye, and take your dossier with you. sean: we are running out of time. the irony of all sll of this is hillary clinton paid for russian lies, dr. gorka and sara. russian collusion is right here.ou it s right here. this is a russian collusion.
fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. let me start with you on the legal side. the bulk of the application, what they didn t adhere, which was in that nunes house in tall memo, steele before the election was known to hate donald trump. very important key. so the bulk of information that the fbi gave to the fisa court was the steele dossier, which we know is unverified, which comey said in january to trump was unverified, but they used it anyway. what does this tell you? tells you you need a calculator to add up all the various crimes that were committed by the department of justice and the fbi. they concealed vital facts to the court. they deceived the judge in getting the. warrant approval. they knew that the dossier was phony, politically motivated, they knew that steele was biased and untrustworthy and had lied. so when they signed under
an october 2016 for the fisa warrant as well as subsequent renewal applications, the fbi repeatedlyte represented to the fisa court that mr. steele told the fbi he did not have unauthorized contacts with the press about the dossier prior to october 2016. that is false. the phis applications make these claims specifically in the context of the september 2016as yahoo! news article. mr. steele has admitted publicly before a court of law that he did have such contacts with the press at this time and his former business partner, mr. simpson, had confirmed it to the committee. thus, the fisa applications are either materially false in claiming that mr. steele said he did not provide dossier information to thepr press prior to october 2016, or mr. steele made materially false statements to the fbi when he claimed he only provided the dossier information to his business partner and thene fbi. page seven continues.