twitter field or a rally. i personally think this should move as quickly as possible because no matter what you want, you re not going to get a fair trial in the senate, and mitch mcconnell and lindsey graham have both been clear about that. howard: so the media are public because they don t think she has any ability to influence mcconnell. what they re looking for is four republican senators to say, yes, we would like to hear from witnesses as well which is a key element to having a trial. tail, that s a really good point though, mcconnell was saying he wants to do the trial in the same way they did the clinton trial where you hear the cases made for and against, and then you decide whether to have witnesses. the idea that you would jump the ship there and move forward without having first had the cases made would be an outlier from how howard: as we heard at the top of the show, susan, a number of pundits ripped the president for that six-page letter to nancy pelosi, she s elfi
howard: you know, the press halls also been very critical lately of senator mitch mcconnell for saying he s working very closely with the white house and people like you on the senate trial, that there s not going to be any difference between the two sides. and the criticism from the media is he s hardly an impartial juror. your thoughts. look, i think it s going to be pretty hard to believe that chuck schumer s an impartial juror either. clearly, there is going to be an opportunity in the senate to grant the president a fair process that he was deprived in the house. i believe we ll get there. don t forget in 1999 the precedent set by the clinton impeachment had 100 senators voting for it. and i do think leader mcconnell wants to have a bipartisanly-approved process, something, again, that did not happen in the house and one that gives the president his real rights and ap opportunity to have a fair trial. howard: and finally, tony, with the president and, of course, he s had this
what s on his mind. howard: you know, the press halls also been very critical lately of senator mitch mcconnell for saying he s working very closely with the white house and people like you on the senate trial, that there s not going to be any difference between the two sides. and the criticism from the media is he s hardly an impartial juror. your thoughts. look, i think it s going to be pretty hard to believe that chuck schumer s an impartial juror either. clearly, there is going to be an opportunity in the senate to grant the president a fair process that he was deprived in the house. i believe we ll get there. don t forget in 1999 the precedent set by the clinton impeachment had 100 senators voting for it. and i do think leader mcconnell wants to have a bipartisanly-approved process, something, again, that did not happen in the house and one that gives the president his real rights and ap opportunity to have a fair trial. howard: and finally, tony, with the president and, of co
trump is going to be saying on a twitter field or a rally. i personally think this should move as quickly as possible because no matter what you want, you re not going to get a fair trial in the senate, and mitch mcconnell and lindsey graham have both been clear about that. howard: so the media are public because they don t think she has any ability to influence mcconnell. what they re looking for is four republican senators to say, yes, we would like to hear from witnesses as well which is a key element to having a trial. tail, that s a really good point though, mcconnell was saying he wants to do the trial in the same way they did the clinton trial where you hear the cases made for and against, and then you decide whether to have witnesses. the idea that you would jump the ship there and move forward without having first had the cases made would be an outlier from how howard: as we heard at the top of the show, susan, a number of pundits ripped the president for that six-page l
think irritated the president because for seven years the people in congress have been saying republicans in congress have been saying we will repeal and replace obamacare. the house passes a bill, we have a president ready to sign a bill, it gets stalled in the senate where a lot of the senators who voted against a very good bill in the senate to repeal and reform obamacare, the senators voted against it had voted for repeal when president obama was president and there was no risk in doing so. so i think the president was irritated. i don t think leader mcconnell s statement was very helpful in the dialogue. and it s the kind of thing that this president react to and he reacted. let s talk about a different kind of reaction. the rhetoric, the back and forth with north korea. are you concerned? i m not a foreign policy expert and i think, like many of the people who have been talking about this, number one, we don t know what the president is hearing. we don t know what intellige