That he would offer to defend me in a patent boosted patent lawsuit had been named in. I asked what he was talking about. I do not copy anybody patents. He says, youre infringing on a patent. I read the patent. The patent seems to describe looking up a name on a list. And xplane is sold on the google store. Apparently the way to store works, as they look up a list to see if a company a customer paid for the simulator. So, since i am on the global store, it looks up a name on a list to see if somebody paid for the app. And i am due to pay the money. It cost me 3 million to defend myself. And they offer to go away if i would give them 50,000. I am electing to pay the 3 million if that is what it takes. My case is rare. 97 of the people that are sued by patent control have to settle because they do not have the 3 million to defend themselves. 97 of them settle. They pay an average of 300,000. Now, when they pay the settlement, they are locked up under a nondisclosure agreement which the c
I think that is a fair question. Can i jump in . Lets go back to an issue that elizabeth raised earlier. Go right ahead. I want to dig in deeper on this sort of plain text of the language issue and alito focusing on at least the housing case, you just look at the plaintext of the law as it was written in 1968. And if the plaintext of the lot as it was written in 1968 did it mean to include the disparate impact, you cannot include disparate impact. But in opposition to that justice, it went to a very prolonged discussion about the fact that you look at the law holistically. If you look at the law in all of its elements when you are trying to determine whether or not there was a statutory intent for whatever the question is. And i think that is important, going back to the point that was made earlier because in my mind if scalia votes against disparate impact, he is going against the president has event that he is has already set forth, the believe he is already set forth in the does rai
I think that is a fair question. Can i jump in . Lets go back to an issue that elizabeth raised earlier. Go right ahead. I want to dig in deeper on this sort of plain text of the language issue and alito focusing on at least the housing case, you just look at the plaintext of the law as it was written in 1968. And if the plaintext of the lot as it was written in 1968 did it mean to include the disparate impact, you cannot include disparate impact. But in opposition to that justice, it went to a very prolonged discussion about the fact that you look at the law holistically. If you look at the law in all of its elements when you are trying to determine whether or not there was a statutory intent for whatever the question is. And i think that is important, going back to the point that was made earlier because in my mind if scalia votes against disparate impact, he is going against the president has event that he is has already set forth, the believe he is already set forth in the does rai
That he would offer to defend me in a patent boosted patent lawsuit had been named in. I asked what he was talking about. I do not copy anybody patents. He says, youre infringing on a patent. I read the patent. The patent seems to describe looking up a name on a list. And xplane is sold on the google store. Apparently the way to store works, as they look up a list to see if a company a customer paid for the simulator. So, since i am on the global store, it looks up a name on a list to see if somebody paid for the app. And i am due to pay the money. It cost me 3 million to defend myself. And they offer to go away if i would give them 50,000. I am electing to pay the 3 million if that is what it takes. My case is rare. 97 of the people that are sued by patent control have to settle because they do not have the 3 million to defend themselves. 97 of them settle. They pay an average of 300,000. Now, when they pay the settlement, they are locked up under a nondisclosure agreement which the c
But action their plant to graduate school with his. Father. Ims first met her when i would put that was in your system that i thought was enrages i have written a book called fall of the of fantasy so we had could find debating the entire set of questions. I am very confident that i wonder she acquitted herself very well. But the most recent list of us dont know the utterly shameful condition of the indian reservations and in the shameful treatment that native americans received from the federal government. Naomi has coined the new trail of tears san you will see why that is such a fitting title. And why the story she has to tallis the allimportant. [applause] but his this aid depressing topic so i will begin. And of the above the reservation that makes up the second poorest county in the United States in 2013 the five Police Officers assigned to patrol the area receives 16200500 calls for Emergency Assistance program want to take a moment to do the math. As of 2009 there were 39 innin