Page 33 - Thirteenth Amendment News Today

Jan Willem van Hofwege // Shutterstock Passing the U.S. citizenship test is a vital step toward becoming an American citizen. To pass the civics portion of the test, an applicant must correctly answer six of up to 10 oral U.S. history and government-r...

SC on 22A: Part II by Dr Jayampathy Wickramaratne, President’s Counsel In Part I of this article, the writer argued that the determination of the Supreme Court in the case of the Nineteenth Amendment was preferable to that of the Twenty-second Amendment Bill (22A). Removal of the PM, not executive power The writer submits that […]

The most dehumanizing aspect of slavery is the stripping away of individuality and the brutalization of ambition.

Editor’s note: The following is by contributor Brent Engel, who wrote extensively of John Brooks Henderson and the Whiskey Ring in his 2019 book “They Call Us Pikers.”

The 2022 Black Family Reunion takes place throughout Cincinnati on Aug. 18-21. The theme of this years event is "bold and beautiful."

On April 26, 1886, more than two decades after the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, a Haida man named Sah Quah entered a United States courtroom in Sitka. A judge later described him as “sad spectacle” of a man, with

Adam Liptak, the New York Times’ Supreme Court reporter, recently published an article in which he claims that Brown v. Board of Education, the case that held that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits racial segregation in public schools, is “problematic for originalists.” He goes a step further, claiming that “originalists hate talking about Brown.”

The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination should direct the United States government to take immediate, tangible measures to dismantle structural racism in the United States, Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union said today, releasing a joint report to the committee.

What if the more the government kills, the more the crazies among us do so? What do we do about it?

What if the purpose of sending nearly $60 billion in cash and military aid to Ukraine is to extend the war Ukraine can only win if American troops become - Andrew P. Napolitano for Antiwar.com Original