Page 3 - Threshold Question News Today

fox news alert. supreme court court, majority ruled that presidents have limited immunity from prosecution and they can be criminally prosecuted for unofficial acts. trump claiming he had presidential immunity from four felony charges in his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. im sandra smith in for harris faulkner. a big news day. the supreme court has thrown the case back to a federal judge to decide if trumps felony january 6th charges meet the criteria for prosecution. a trump c...

poll numbers in the debate and a top holster for the biden/harris campaign is going to join me for an exclusive interview here in studio. nancy pelosi is standing by theç president and firing back at donald trump. nancy pelosi will also be here in just a few minutes. and later, trumps supreme court repairs to rule on trumps claim of. better late than never, i guess. and some thoughts on why the real damage has already been done. done. okay. okay. lets start with the obvious. joe biden...

evening. im bret baier. were coming to you tonight from fox news world headquarters in new york. and breaking tonight, you have heard it all day. we are three hours from the start of what figures to be the most important event of the 2024 presidential campaign so far. president biden will face former president trump in the debate in atlanta. tonight both camps are setting exceptions, and getting in some preevent spin. meanwhile, there is still no decision from the u.s. supreme court on...

Insurrection clause which is unprecedented. >> it is also unprecedented for a presidential candidate to engage in insurrection. >> however, the fact remains, donald trump has not been charged or found guilty of insurrection in any criminal court. here with me around the table, podcaster cara swisher. editor of "the decision pasch" and "los angeles times"" columnist jonah goldberg. lulu navarro. and president of the manhattan institute and contributing editor of "the national review," welcome b...

That puts this whole call and the other activities that meadows was engaging in squarely in the political realm. any reasonable person can see that. so it not only undercuts meadows claim to remove the trial to federal court, itll be an issue when donald trump comes to federal court and says, "im immune under the presidential immunity document because i was concerned there was fraud in the election." deeply concerning hearing yesterday. >> lisa, im sure people are wondering, if you are participa...

Authority? yes i mean, it could for the supreme court. everything could be on the table, including papi. a threshold question of whether these anti abortion physicians and medical groups even had no legal standing to even bring this case, and im sure that when we see the department of justice appeal, theyre really going to hit that strong too. okay? thank you, joan very much . thanks a lot. so the nations attention captured with that story and this one as well, of course. national city council s...

Medication, abortion drugs, but for all drugs, so thats thats a significant question. and then theres other also a threshold question. the groups that sued down in texas specifically looking for this judge and looking for a sympathetic ruling from this judge, those groups you know, could arguably not have legal standing to bring their case that was a very real question. the lower court judge did say that these physicians and medical groups that were claiming an injury to themselves from the use ...

Physically. and so where does that stand and everything, you know. >> the trial now has established as a matter of law and fact that there was a conspiracy, a seditious conspiracy against the united states. this is the first time, though, in at least more than a century in which you could say a president had some relationship to such a conspiracy. the question is now, of course, can you prove it, as bob said, with evidence. the interesting thing about merrick garlands decision to appoint a speci...

Hes an active candidate seeking votes? or even if he does bring charges, does it discredit them in the minds of the trump supporting public because he said, this is all politics to try to get me? that is the concern a lot of people have. having said, that theres an interesting observation that one lawyer made. he said look, the fact that merrick garland, the attorney general, was willing to appoint a special counsel may indicate something important. it may indicate that he is past the threshold ...

Pulling troops back is not enough because they can fall back on their equipment. so, moving heavy forces out is a signal we should watch for. >> let me follow up on that. should we start agreeing to negotiate the terms of any future ukraine entry into nato since theres nothing imminent, not going to happen for six years or a decade. they havent proved their democracy is strong and theyve fought corruption. should we begin talking about that or, as the u.s. has been claiming, is that a nonstarter...