Page 43 - Throated News Today

Nato brain dead. this is a president who for three years has been consistently critical of nato, has raised questions about whether we go to bat for montenegro or other countries. hes been clearly soft on russia. hes after the allies for what they spend or dont spend on defense. so, again, two full -- two full-throated defenses of nato in a week is quite extraordinary for a president who is, shall we say, rather critical of american allies not just in europe but as we also heard this morning in ...

>> sandra: thats the one -- >> they rolled back on it in an effort to keep the supreme court from addressing the issue. the supreme court has come down with two opinions in the past 10 years, one called heller, one called mcdonald. they first -- they both unambiguously support the right to keep and bear arms in the home. this is the first case after heller and after mcdonald to address the right to keep and bear arms outside the home. thats what the people who run the government of the city of n...

Dont take relationships for granted. >> senator lindsey graham with an emotional defense of joe biden in 2016. you take it to today, senator graham is launching an investigation into the bidens and their business dealings with ukraine, part of the his full-throated defense of president trumps completely so far unsubstantiated claims of former wrongdoing by the former vice president and his son. now the former vice president now responding. >> he knows me. he knows my son. he knows theres nothing...

States. the eu ambassador said everyone knew exactly what was going on. holding up military aid in exchange for announcing political investigations from the vice president mike pence to the secretary of state mike pompeo. and other senior officials as well. chris? >> all right, wolf. lets begin our coverage here on capitol hill with one of the most incisive questioners ive seen in this. im going to have mike quigley next to me. but lets get the play from manu raju. you are not one of the most in...

But the opportunity gap is even worse. >> i want to ask you about the impeachment inquiry. yesterday it seems to reach a head with gordon sondlands testimony. i want to play for you something you said about all of this, about what would happen when the facts came out. you said this back on september 26th. let me play this moment for you. >> we are just on the foothills of a mountain of evidence that will come out in the coming days and weeks. and i have faith at the end of the day knowing a lot ...

Include lg in the afternoon session from volker. the special enjoy to ukraine who like sondland changed prior testimony. we have the key moments. >> reporter: four current and former trump administration officials testifying during day three of the public impeachment hearings. all expressing differs degrees of disappointment and disapproval of the presidents july 25th phone call with president zelensky. where trump pushed for investigations into the 2016 election and bidens. >> i was hoping for ...

You have many credible witnesses saying that phone call happened. he said he didnt remember. >> he said i dont know anything about that. >> right, right, right. but we all now know there were multiple people who heard that phone call. >> sometimes he lies? >> im not going there, but i think his track record is not that stellar when it comes to things he says he doesnt recall or people who he says he doesnt know. that having been said, given the number of witnesses and now the fact that there are...

Not being a full throated embrace of the ukrainian reform agenda. is that fair? >> yes, congressman. >> with his respect to the concern of something improper, specifically at no point did he come to you and say, i heard something that i thought was improper and was a crime. >> sir, i have no recollection of him doing that. >> no bribe, no extortion, no quid pro quo, all of those things we asked you? >> no, sir, . >> as you were listening, did you hear president trump make a demand of anything th...

Discussion about not -- there not being a full throated embrace of the ukrainian reform agenda. is that fair? >> yes, congressman. >> okay. but with respect to his concern about something improper, specifically at no point did he come to you and say i heard something that i thought was improper and was a crime. >> sir, i have no recollection of him doing that. >> no bribe, no extortion, no quid pro quo? >> no, sir. >> all right. and as you were listening, did you hear president trump make a dema...

>> i believe so, yes, sir. >> did you hear president trump mentioned the bidens? >> yes, sir. >> did you hear president trump and the link of that phone call use the word corruption? >> no, sir -- well, sir, i dont believe he did. >> was the requested that ukraine investigate crowd strike and the bidens consistent with what you understood to be official u.s. policy towards combating corruption in the ukraine? >> sir, it was the first i heard of a bunch of this. >> infect in your deposition, you ...