more killings. i m joined now by chief laws parchment and intelligence analyst john miller, former nypd deputy commissioner. this is incredible. apparently, the wife and children are cooperating with investigators, which is a good sign. they are free to, they ve been able to gather evidence on the house, obviously. yes, they did that pursuant to an extensive search warrant for the home and property, garage, attachments, computers, thumb drives, hard drives and so on. it is going to take them a long time to get there what they took, and there is going to be a process to figure out what some of it means. to you, what stands out on the case? it s extraordinary to me how early on, the profiler view of a theoretical color might be sounded very accurate. he reveals himself, even though he does not tell us who he is. he tells us early in the case
investigators, which is certainly a good sign. so, they re free to they ve been able to gather a lot of evidence from his house obviously. yes, and they did that pursuant, obviously, to an extensive search warrant for the home, the property, and the outbuildings, garages, attachments, computers, thumb drives, hard drives, and so on. it s going to take them a long time to get through what they took. and there s going to be a process to figuring out what some of it means. i mean, what do you to you, what stands out in this case? it s extraordinary to me how early on the profiler view of who the theoretical killer might be sounded very accurate. well, he reveals himself, even though he doesn t tell us who he is, he tells us early in the case what he is. i think the turning point moment there was you see he is preying on sex workers, you know, strangling them to death after
chelsea manning? they try to plug a hole restrictions on thumb drives, which is how that service member got this stuff out. but senator mark warner asked a smart question today, he said. why wasn t there tracking of printing out classified documents as appears to have happened in this case? that strikes me as a fairly basic oversight issues here. do you think there was poor oversight of this unit and the service member? what i think is there are structural changes that have to be made to how we handle classified information. there s kind of three ways of looking at this number one. what is the level of somebody s clearance or whether they have a secret where they have a top secret? whether they have a special compartmented clearance number two is the need to know. just because you have a top secret clearance doesn t mean you should have access to all of the top secret information has to be further compartmented. based on need to know number three is what types of electronic or automate
the second thing is clearly the security issue itself. after snowden from what i understand we thought to stop the thumb drives being used babe operating these networks. they cannot take out information from them for this otherwise to take information out. think initially he was taking notes on it. while he still got out of the facility with this note somewhere on his person. secondly i think he began to make copies of it. if you are going to do something in the system, listen i am not an it person. i think you can have a system alert if someone is going to transfer information on the system to some other vehicle, even a copy machine. maybe that person is authorized to do that based on a position that they have. other people there should be a default system. so the security is an issue. we were blindsided by this for the intelligent services are blindsided. the pentagon is. we have got to get to the bottom