Page 4 - Tim Collin News Today

Specific reasons why those provisions in the chiu legislation should be adapted may not adapted in the context but the problem is those pieces are not being considered together and thats one of a number of issues of affordability. So you may be and we all maybe supporting the requested were to be creating housing affordable by design but unless the regulations that come along with the unit protect against the ellis act were going to see evictions a few years after those units and those protectio...

Community meetings so for the time being the zone in m1 and if theres changes to that will trail other conversations with the property owner. Other additional changes to that planning code and to the map ordinance are to theres a post application hearing and thats also intended to be a required meeting not an openal one and from the last the may 8th hearing we Heard Community testimony about getting more clarity about what the roll is for continued participation and the vertical Development Sinc...

Commissioner just presented i think the not going forwards of this project i feel it would be better served to have a full commission. Is there a motion. Well with respect to this first item from the City Attorneys Office but that could result in a continuance or not i dont know. Unless theres a compelling argument to continue it i think 5 can make a decision as well as 5 for that matter commissioner moore. Im happy to continue. I have to admit i am reluctant to go forward because the burden is ...

Want to ask if the commissioners feel okay to move forward with 5 members of the commissioner well based upon what ive heard in asking for continuance i dont see a basis, however, in a project of this size i think it would be better to have a full commissioner but i would entertain the remarks from the other commissioners. Said agree with what commissioner just presented i think the not going forwards of this project i feel it would be better served to have a full commission. Is there a motion. ...

Members of the public probably dont know were not allowed to speak outside this quorum. At this point were public im fine with continuing it and im trying to figure out what people want. I dont think were clear on that. Now by letting the audience know on the one hand on moving forward on this item sometime needs to clearly state their opinion and i could weigh in and this is sort of new information and i tend to think that i would rather have president fong here to hear the item and so theres a...

Action all over the place today. In the industrials, in the autos, in the oils, and in the back. But i saw some bizarre Silver Linings in this market that you might not appreciate. Silver linings that i think were necessary to come to the fore, before this market can go higher. So what are they . First, you know that ive been very concerned about what i regard as some of the frothier segments of the market. Yesterday, for example, while we were on ensco 99, the gulf of mexico, i would walk by th...

37 harriet street which we think is about the right size for living. The unit we are proposing for 31 Mission Street which will be occupied by cc a are here. Katie you need to go that way. They are with kitchens and cook tops individual bathrooms and tubes. Large bay windows and good storage. Its 1 hundred percent car free. It will have a city car share car in the building and parking for 2 hundred and 40 bicycles in the basement. Its in the mist of an area thats undergoing tremendous change rig...

It closed on june 19, 2012. Subsequently to the Public Comments document we noticed a minor area we would like to correct for the record. I have copies for the public as well on page 128 theres a footnote number 6 is erroneously struck through. In fact, it should have been shown that were adding it as imply text instead of eir. And theres another error with the footnote so, please restore them in those two locations. Having address the the error found it the implementation of the project wouldnt...

Final hearing and theyve been presented to you already on the general calendar good morning. Im lisa Planning Department staff. The item before you is the vial Impact Report for the project. A draft of the certification motion is before you. The definite was pushed on may second 2012. It closed on june 19, 2012. Subsequently to the Public Comments document we noticed a minor area we would like to correct for the record. I have copies for the public as well on page 128 theres a footnote number 6 ...

And theres another error with the footnote so, please restore them in those two locations. Having address the the error found it the implementation of the project wouldnt result in any significant Environmental Impact that couldnt be mitigated therefore the commission would not need to adopt a statement pursuant to the california quality act should the commission choose to approve the project. We would like to have the consents of the report show they are adequate. And we want this to show its o...