September and were very pleased that long last that system will be in place and greatly help our ability to track projects to keep track of our work and allow much more robust access for the public to see how were doing on development so moving on to case and permit volume trends. We are continuing to experience unprecedented volume growth both in terms and various planning cases. We have seen this growth over four years and case volume is projected to double with the year to year growth. By increasing more than 1100 permits and cases in the current fiscal year compared to year over year growth of 500 or less permits in prior years so were seeing more than double the normal pace. We have seen Significant Growth in many applications including environmental applications, Building Permits and unusual number of projects that are alterations to existing buildings and because of that since so much of the building stock is old it increases the need for us to look at historic nature of our bui
Expenditures we have to pay and the Program Notification is 15 percent of the total expenditures including the operations reserve so the slide shows that the first and second year of each 5 year programs has dramatically higher than cash flows from the 5 year period this is a combination of rolling projects forward so the expenditures from the existing allocated projects whether you see in the blue box 40 percent of the cash in the early years 20152016 is from looltsz prongs the prop k sponsors have been slow to allocate the expenditures to balance that it has in some cases be able to spend other funds ramble the prop k this leads to refinancing the costs and funding for the projects so to note here over the last 5 years there was a spike in the first two years of projected cash flow and what the sponsors in 2009, 20142015 and theres a discrepancy before what we actually spent on the Capital Projects all right. With that, im happy to take questions on the Strategic Plan. So any questio
Todays secretary, to the president , too i says congress and our lives less than 490,000 men and women in uniform. Absolutely appeared to plan with god now takes an active army of 450000. When they make sure you understand the question. In the absence of sequestration with sequestration requires, which you otherwise see a circumstance in which you recommend the 450,000 450,000 personnel to the secretary . Is there a scenario in which theyll look good for the safety and security of our country . Teaching staff of the army and the secretary have a plan that they have put forward where they can meet the National Security interest in the numbers bear. I have supported them in now. General odierno himself would tell you that greater risk than a 490 army. The question really becomes back to my testimony about the security environment. Where do we want to maintain the forward presence that we have . If the answer to that as we want to be less worried and more at home, we just incurred risk. A
There would be a change in mr. Dsm point, that that might affect america. As the senate are not aware that any change to the treaty in order to go into effect and has any impact on the United States would require the nascent consent . Without the advice and consent of the senate, no change could possibly impact United States. Outhouses the bureaucrats running the program would have clarification word is otherwise vague. The point i am making here is we dont really need to do that when we have her hearing. I understand theres a difference of opinion on this and a lot of motion. I found this mornings roll call magazine, all the people find appeared with the distinguished senator from massachusetts. It doesnt say anything in the articles that certainly attacks the emotions of individuals. So yes, i am not satisfied they would not interfere and do their clarification to change the intent. Weve taken care of our problem here. The mr. President , its important in this kind of debate as to ma
To mobile wireless, but for fixed wireless you could be talking about 10 to 100 megabits connection over multikilometer distances, very easily in the next couple of years. Do you have a paper we could understand that you could cite for us . Ive written about this informally in a Free State Foundation perspective piece. Ill be looking it up. I might be doing future work in this area. The research and development in this area, the next generation of Technology Wireless really is incredibly powerful. And i think it has potential to reshape the landscape in ways that hopefully the regulars wont mess up. But ways that will be very, very powerful. So, my thoughts to sure my boss has taken a position on special caps i dont want to get out in front of him, but i think its interesting to look at spectrum caps versus spectrum screens from a perspective of flexibility and certainty. I find it really interesting that people complained about screen not offering the type of certainty they need for p