of the public. more than half a century has passed since 1978, the arguments for his release went. the family who objected knows this. when someone you love is gunned down, time doesn t move from that hour, that moment. that event is your prison and there is no release from it. hinckley s assassination attempt took place 40 years ago, but it s not over for you, as you write there. yeah, but you know, also i reread today rory kennedy s new york times op-ed about objecting to hassan s release and he was incarcerated for 50 years. she brought up a good point about the loss to the country. obviously her father died and my father did not die that day. but when somebody tries to assassinate a president or assassinate a public figure or a presidential candidate, they affect the entire country.
one of the other problems is, it s so late. and it s already knocked the senate off the schedule. if you re the senate and you allow this to get knocked back any more. every single let s be clear, male republican nominee for the supreme court will have someone come forward? what? it will be the end. and we ll say, oh, gee, we should hear this out. time doesn t mean that you re going to have people jump out. that shouldn t be the risk of having more time in the process. i want to get your opinion on something that matters more than timing. what is the standard. laura, we don t have the comforts of beyond a reasonable doubt, findings of due process, how we vet and test and procure and proffer evidence at trial,
the freedom caucus hate this bill, think it is too much money and don t get much out of it. they re voting no on this. pay no attention to the timer. leadership can keep it open as long as they want. they ll see how many republican votes they ll get. i think you ll see a horse trading process with democrats, to see if democratic votes are needed to get this done, to try to see if they can move to this today. this is the vote to watch, hallie. haven t the democrats voted no? they can also come out in 5, 10 or 30 minutes and say, i have assurances on paul ryan, and it is okay to vote yes. it is an active process. stand by for us. time doesn t matter. this thing can stay open as long as they need it to. we re not going to call it, obviously. it won t get called until it is gavelled, which hasn t happened step. garrett, stand by on that. yes votes, 204 at the moment. we ll keep an eye on that.
rafael was let out of seg to general population by our discipline hearing officers. he did his job correctly. there was no paperwork turned in as far as incident reports that narrated actually what happened. without those reports, we cannot justifiably hold somebody in the seg unit. doesn t mean they didn t do it, it just means they are lacking the paperwork. rafael gonzalez. but gonzalez s return to general population does not protect him from facing possible criminal charges. nor does it take him off sergeant collette s radar. remember what happened, what put you in seg? yes, sir. you stomped that guy, okay because you believed he did something of sexual nature to a 12-year-old? yes, sir. what that what you believe? yes, sir. you want to know the truth of what happened? yes, sir. she wasn t 12. she was 16. i made a mistake, sir.
all right. you have some serious soul searching to do. i suggest you do it. all right. lall right, man. all right. well nava remains in segregation, the inmate who initiated the attack, rafael gonzalez is back in let out of sec to general population by our discipline hearing officers. he did his job correctly. there was no paperwork turned in as far as incident reports that narrated actually what happened. without those reports, we cannot justifiably hold somebody in the seg unit. doesn t mean they didn t do it, it just means they are lacking the paperwork. rafael gonzalez. but gonzalez s return to general population does not