Is there a number of times that they get to do this . Thats a good and tough question. Its so tough that i decided not to use the mike. Thats a good and a tough question. What the law provides, what the administrative procedure act provides is that a court can compel an agency to take action of the delay taking when its been unreasonably delayed. Unreasonable is not a precise term but i dont know how it can be written in any other manner. It depends on what the circumstances are. And as i indicated, there have been times when courts have told agencies its now time to get your act together and do this. Those cases have been rare and involve much longer delays than the current one and they involve powerful evidence that the agency is not merely trying to force a law in, its not trying to enforce it at all. As i said, and as professor turley noted, there have been cases of administration sitting on their hands and not carrying outlaws and that clearly is illegal and unconstitutional. Its
Here, were not suing the president because he lied about weapons of mass destruction and brought us into a war where thousands of americans were killed and almost bankrupted our treasury. Were not suing because of some sort of deal to Exchange Arms for hostages. Were focused in on a narrow provision of the Affordable Care act, i guess, because we havent seen the exact lawsuit theyre going to file. Im just trying to figure out, if everything goes the way they want it to then they get a judge to hear it and it gets all the approvals they want, what is success . What is the end of all this . What do they get . Someone explain to me what happens if they win. As i said earlier, mr. Mcgovern, any victory was likely to come before the grace period had expired for business in any event, but sorry, after the grace period ended. Thank you. But in a larger sense, the theory of standing here, that theres an institutional injury in one house of the congress. If an executive administration in admini
Fit with reality. Congress general capacity over funding the executive branch of the government gives Congress Lots of authority to rein in the president. President s have used their Statutory Authority in very large ways. The framers of the constitution came close to giving us a legislatively centered government. But in august of 1787 in a very dramatic period at the very end of the Constitutional Convention led by governor morris of pennsylvania, rufus king of new york, they gave the president independent authority. They gave the president for the first time the authority to negotiate treaties. They gave the president the power to nominate judges, which previously had been the purview of the senate in earlier drafts. They created an independent executive branch because they saw that this government was going to be entrusted with large responsibilities, and you needed a strong executive. Thats what weve seen through washington and lincoln and roosevelt and others, that this country se
JO MORELAND Staff Writer Performing an aerial stunt that recalls the days of the earlybarnstormers, a small number of modern-day private pilotsapparently can't seem to resist the urge to fly under the LilacBridge over Interstate 15 north of Escondido, authorities say.
PHOTOS: Maplewoodstock Weather Bubble Mostly Holds for Successful 2023 Event villagegreennj.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from villagegreennj.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.