Ch change. The types of things youre looking for change. Is austin the right person to handle rooting out extremism for the military . He absolutely is. Secretary austin is someone who because of that experience and because he came up through the ranks and served as an officer, first africanamerican secretary of defense, he does have a unique understanding of the challenges that we face here. I think theres some very specific things that he needs to do and i think he understands that. I think he understands that he needs to be more intrusive. We need to be more intrusive into the lives of our service members. I think he understands we need to be absolutely sure we are using the uniform code of military to prosecute people on active duty who engage in these activities. And i think he gets we need to fully understand the full nature of the problem. s important to point out the vast people in the military are not interested in this. They want to do the right thing. Secretary austin gets t
michael cohen s cell phone, if you look sad and he can t copy, and he can t transcribed notes. they re really trying to minimize how much of this can leak into the public ahead of the trial. and we all remember that donald trump does pose things on his social media, particularly when he is displeased with an investigation. so how do we get here to the point where the judge felt the need to do this? so this was all from the prosecutors. if you remember at the arraignment they brought up trump s post, because all leading up to the charges he was criticizing the district attorney alvin bragg. he was putting out some pretty inflammatory posts. and even then he was criticizing the judge in this case. so the prosecutor said look, you keep saying all the stuff on social media, can we reign this cnn? the judge was very even-handed. he said i ve been telling both sides prosecution you control your witnesses, defense you control your client, don t put anything on social media that
michael cohen s cell phone, if you look sad and he can t copy, and he can t transcribed notes. they re really trying to minimize how much of this can leak into the public ahead of the trial. and we all remember that donald trump does pose things on his social media, particularly when he is displeased with an investigation. so how do we get here to the point where the judge felt the need to do this? so this was all from the prosecutors. if you remember at the arraignment they brought up trump s post, because all leading up to the charges he was criticizing the district attorney alvin bragg. he was putting out some pretty inflammatory posts. and even then he was criticizing the judge in this case. so the prosecutor said look, you keep saying all the stuff on social media, can we reign this cnn? the judge was very even-handed. he said i ve been telling both sides prosecution you control your witnesses, defense you control your client, don t put anything on social media that could be c
issue. it doesn t affect that many people. it s just designed to energize the base for 2024. because they tried abortion, a centrally, and that didn t really work. that backfired in the midterms. so now they have found another issue to generate, to animate voters. and that is what is designed for. you say doesn t affect that many people, it s one parent. this is what is so frustrating. it s hard not to see it as the tyranny of the minority. so if one parent can launch these multiple complaints against books that he or she are not comfortable with, and that the library responds, or the school response, that doesn t feel. write it also plays into, as well, as we are seeing across the country, you are seeing how school boards have become so political, and that there are people who were feel fearful and getting threats because they were on the school board and people in town don t like the way they were voting on certain issues, and it could be something like this. all of, that to your
is that probably what they will probably ? that is what i imagine, that s what i think they re going to. do i also think that, look, for president biden you have to think about how this is going to cost him politically, if this goes pear shaped. with the elections next. year there s so much at stake for him, politically. if there is some kind of default that opens up a lot of room for president trump. when you blame him another republicans in congress? i think that especially with the elections coming up next year i think it would not be good for him. his approval ratings have already suffered and doesn t look good. it opens up room for double. trump when you think about, mccarthy is no wiggle room for him because he could lose his job. one person can call a vote and he could lose his job. so i m not sure it s how i was going to play out politically, but from both sides it s so much at stake here that you would think that although, i will say for the house, there is that sayi